Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Assess the Striker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Retreater" data-source="post: 5841061" data-attributes="member: 42040"><p>The defender is a battlemind (so without marking, he can't use his mindspike ability). He is essentially playing the character like a 3.5 fighter ... which is a slayer with less damage potential, better AC, and more HP. I keep reminding him to mark, and he'll say things like "but I'm prone so I can't mark" or "I want to be able to attack this round." I try to tell him this isn't the case, but he just shrugs and says he just wants to attack. </p><p> </p><p>It's a challenge because I have the following group configuration: the warlock/rogue hybrid who wants to gimp his character; the battlemind who never uses his abilities to mark (or even his other psionic abilities other than At-Will melee attacks); a highly competitive and effective ranger; a warpriest who is effective despite not understanding that she doesn't need to spread her ability scores across 3-4 good scores; and a pretty effective invoker - played by a new player - but designed by me to be awesome. </p><p> </p><p>The only reason I'm bringing this up is that they are complaining about the challenge and that their characters are ineffective. </p><p> </p><p>I can't help but think that the players would be happier and their characters more effective if they took other characters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Retreater, post: 5841061, member: 42040"] The defender is a battlemind (so without marking, he can't use his mindspike ability). He is essentially playing the character like a 3.5 fighter ... which is a slayer with less damage potential, better AC, and more HP. I keep reminding him to mark, and he'll say things like "but I'm prone so I can't mark" or "I want to be able to attack this round." I try to tell him this isn't the case, but he just shrugs and says he just wants to attack. It's a challenge because I have the following group configuration: the warlock/rogue hybrid who wants to gimp his character; the battlemind who never uses his abilities to mark (or even his other psionic abilities other than At-Will melee attacks); a highly competitive and effective ranger; a warpriest who is effective despite not understanding that she doesn't need to spread her ability scores across 3-4 good scores; and a pretty effective invoker - played by a new player - but designed by me to be awesome. The only reason I'm bringing this up is that they are complaining about the challenge and that their characters are ineffective. I can't help but think that the players would be happier and their characters more effective if they took other characters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Assess the Striker
Top