Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jdrakeh" data-source="post: 2737286" data-attributes="member: 13892">Well, my point was that statements like that are entirely subjective. In point of fact, I find (and apparently a few others do, as well) that the 1e combat rules are easier to use than the 3x situation-specific feats. That is, the practicality of said rules depends entirely upon who is applying them. Anyhow, up until now, that's not what was said. What was said was that the AD&amp;D 1e unarmed combat rules rules were...&nbsp;This assertion is flatly untrue. You know, given that some people used them (and that some people still do). And you can say that &quot;depends on perception&quot; is a weak argument, but it's true. It's a fundamental fact of life - opinions differ and no given opinion is right or wrong when it comes right down to it (right and wrong are qualifiers that can only be attached in good faith to conclusively proven facts).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jdrakeh, post: 2737286, member: 13892"] Well, my point was that statements like that are entirely subjective. In point of fact, I find (and apparently a few others do, as well) that the 1e combat rules are easier to use than the 3x situation-specific feats. That is, the practicality of said rules depends entirely upon who is applying them. Anyhow, up until now, that's [i]not[/i] what was said. What was said was that the AD&D 1e unarmed combat rules rules were... This assertion is flatly untrue. You know, given that some people [i]used them[/i] (and that some people still do). And you can say that "depends on perception" is a weak argument, but it's [i]true[/i]. It's a fundamental fact of life - [i]opinions differ[/i] and no given opinion is right or wrong when it comes right down to it (right and wrong are qualifiers that can only be attached in good faith to conclusively proven [i]facts[/i]). [/QUOTE]

Verification