Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
At what point do players know they're fighting Minions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 5091607" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Oh, I don't know. Maybe because knowing all kinds of information about one's opponents so that your tactical decision making is easy, is boring. How many players go "Oh Crap!" when hit by a breath weapon when they know the foe has it as compared to when they get surprised by that in combat? Which is more interesting and entertaining? In both cases, the PC got hit by the attack. In one case, it was a surprise and more fun for the entire group. In the other case, it's just another attack because the players know ahead of time that it's coming.</p><p></p><p>Discovering things and overcoming challenges (including the challenge of discovering things about your foes) is generally more interesting than the DM just blurting it all out in round one.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you find placing hidden traps in the encounter more or less interesting and entertaining than having traps lying around with the word "trap" on them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I really think this concept of the player being heavily informed is a type of "WotC entitlement brainwashing". Somewhere along the line, someone there discovered that some players feel entitled to all kinds of things, so they wrote the rules and guidelines that way in order to sell more product.</p><p></p><p>This is an excellent marketing ploy to keep players happy and wanting more, but it's not how the game should necessarily work. The PCs should not be entitled, the PCs should earn what they gain. Blurting most of the info about foes out (which is no different than auto-identifying items during a short rest) has become the new mantra of "well, that's how it should be played". A good portion of the D&D gaming community has bought into this hook, line, and sinker.</p><p></p><p>It's like someone mentioned earlier in this thread. It's like candy. Keep handing out more and more candy to the players and they feel like they are entitled to candy every time.</p><p></p><p>An interesting anecdote to this. I had a special adventure for one of my players. She was trying to find a minor relic for her goddess and the actual side adventure for it consisted of 2 n+2 encounters and 1 n+4 encounter. I had no treasure parcels in the first two encounters, but had 4 treasure parcels in the final encounter. After the second encounter, one of the players said "Hey, no treasure for either of these fights. What's up with that?". Players are so used to acquiring treasure parcels most encounters that two in a row without was jarring enough for the player to comment on it. Now, he was probably kidding, but they do feel entitled to it anymore.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not the point to discover minion-ness. It will happen eventually, but that is not necessarily the goal.</p><p></p><p>The goal is to defeat the opponents.</p><p></p><p>Discovering minion-ness is no different than discovering elite-ness, or vulnerabilities or special attacks or anything else about the foe.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Interesting? You mean like chess where you know which pieces are the pawns?</p><p></p><p>How is giving that information out interesting in any way?</p><p></p><p>It's actually less complex to give out minion status and makes the tactical choices a lot easier.</p><p></p><p>Your logic is backwards here. The Fighter doesn't make a tactical choice with regard to minions, he makes a no brainer choice. If he has a burst one power than can defeat a bunch of minions and he has the opportunity, he typically uses it. If he doesn't, he attacks a non-minion so that he doesn't waste damage.</p><p></p><p>That's like saying that paying taxes is a choice. Yes, it is a choice to either pay taxes or go to jail, but the choice is already made for 99% of people. They don't really make a choice, they just auto-select the proper choice.</p><p></p><p>Sorry, but transparent minionness results in fewer and less interesting tactical choices. The choices are limited by definition.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Most people typically wouldn't waste a daily on standards or elites either. The threat has to be perceived as serious before dailies are typically used. By telling the players minion status, you tell them "Oh yeah, there are 15 foes here, but it's not really a threat. Don't bother using your Dailies".</p><p></p><p>The DM for all intents and purposes auto-limits the choices of the players.</p><p></p><p>When the players do not know, they have to feel their way through the minefield and make their own choices including choices to do actions that may or may not find out if any of the foes are minions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It adds more of a mystery than just blurting minion status out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 5091607, member: 2011"] Oh, I don't know. Maybe because knowing all kinds of information about one's opponents so that your tactical decision making is easy, is boring. How many players go "Oh Crap!" when hit by a breath weapon when they know the foe has it as compared to when they get surprised by that in combat? Which is more interesting and entertaining? In both cases, the PC got hit by the attack. In one case, it was a surprise and more fun for the entire group. In the other case, it's just another attack because the players know ahead of time that it's coming. Discovering things and overcoming challenges (including the challenge of discovering things about your foes) is generally more interesting than the DM just blurting it all out in round one. Do you find placing hidden traps in the encounter more or less interesting and entertaining than having traps lying around with the word "trap" on them. I really think this concept of the player being heavily informed is a type of "WotC entitlement brainwashing". Somewhere along the line, someone there discovered that some players feel entitled to all kinds of things, so they wrote the rules and guidelines that way in order to sell more product. This is an excellent marketing ploy to keep players happy and wanting more, but it's not how the game should necessarily work. The PCs should not be entitled, the PCs should earn what they gain. Blurting most of the info about foes out (which is no different than auto-identifying items during a short rest) has become the new mantra of "well, that's how it should be played". A good portion of the D&D gaming community has bought into this hook, line, and sinker. It's like someone mentioned earlier in this thread. It's like candy. Keep handing out more and more candy to the players and they feel like they are entitled to candy every time. An interesting anecdote to this. I had a special adventure for one of my players. She was trying to find a minor relic for her goddess and the actual side adventure for it consisted of 2 n+2 encounters and 1 n+4 encounter. I had no treasure parcels in the first two encounters, but had 4 treasure parcels in the final encounter. After the second encounter, one of the players said "Hey, no treasure for either of these fights. What's up with that?". Players are so used to acquiring treasure parcels most encounters that two in a row without was jarring enough for the player to comment on it. Now, he was probably kidding, but they do feel entitled to it anymore. It's not the point to discover minion-ness. It will happen eventually, but that is not necessarily the goal. The goal is to defeat the opponents. Discovering minion-ness is no different than discovering elite-ness, or vulnerabilities or special attacks or anything else about the foe. Interesting? You mean like chess where you know which pieces are the pawns? How is giving that information out interesting in any way? It's actually less complex to give out minion status and makes the tactical choices a lot easier. Your logic is backwards here. The Fighter doesn't make a tactical choice with regard to minions, he makes a no brainer choice. If he has a burst one power than can defeat a bunch of minions and he has the opportunity, he typically uses it. If he doesn't, he attacks a non-minion so that he doesn't waste damage. That's like saying that paying taxes is a choice. Yes, it is a choice to either pay taxes or go to jail, but the choice is already made for 99% of people. They don't really make a choice, they just auto-select the proper choice. Sorry, but transparent minionness results in fewer and less interesting tactical choices. The choices are limited by definition. Most people typically wouldn't waste a daily on standards or elites either. The threat has to be perceived as serious before dailies are typically used. By telling the players minion status, you tell them "Oh yeah, there are 15 foes here, but it's not really a threat. Don't bother using your Dailies". The DM for all intents and purposes auto-limits the choices of the players. When the players do not know, they have to feel their way through the minefield and make their own choices including choices to do actions that may or may not find out if any of the foes are minions. It adds more of a mystery than just blurting minion status out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
At what point do players know they're fighting Minions?
Top