Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Atheism in DnD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mlund" data-source="post: 6692471" data-attributes="member: 50304"><p>"Settings can be different," is a tautology. A setting might not have elves or monks, but we still can (and do) generalize about those races and classes because they exist by default in the Core setting. Customization is a moot point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not a question of advanced theology. It's merely a question of, "Does Melora / Tyr / Bane exist and are assertions to the contrary reasonable?" Arguing the <strong>nature</strong> of these so-called "gods" is a completely different kettle of fish from the absolutist assertion that they simply <strong>don't exist</strong>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As with most things, people accept the greater body of testimony of those who've gained verification themselves - unless they have another rational cause to call that into question. In the question of the existence of, say, Melora and Asmodeus, no one has a rational basis to contradict the clerics' assertion that they exist. There exist (and have existed for thousands of years) third parties with the power to fact-check the existence of gods and the disposition of souls. Despite the means, no one's built the case for the contrary position.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a separate debate over the nature of these so-called "gods" that <strong>do</strong> exist. People can call it "pragmatic atheism," (to act under the assumption of atheism in practice) but asserting that's "a kind of atheism" is just a semantic game. Furthermore the "no one can know and it wouldn't be worth knowing," agnostic premise from apatheism simply doesn't hold up in the setting. There's a <strong>huge</strong> distinction between "I don't care about the existence of Tempus" / "Tempus exists but is unworthy" and the position that "Tempus doesn't / may not exist." Irreligion ("I care not of the gods") and atheism ("Gods don't exist") are not the same.</p><p></p><p>It's perfectly tenable (if perhaps impractical due to afterlife concerns) to take an irreligious position in the Forgotten Realms. It's pretty much insane for anyone but the most ignorant to assert proper atheism, or even agnosticism.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The point you've missed is that these competing clerics <strong>don't deny the existence of their rivals in the pantheon</strong>. The question of "which god is best" or "are any of these gods worth worshiping" is completely beside the point of "do these gods even exist?" I've noted, exhaustively now, that rejecting the qualifications of these "gods" (irreligion) is a vastly more reasonable position for an inhabitant of Oerth or Faerun than the bald assertion that such beings are simply make-believe (pure atheism) and all the clerics and wizards are just in on the conspiracy (delusional psychosis).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mlund, post: 6692471, member: 50304"] "Settings can be different," is a tautology. A setting might not have elves or monks, but we still can (and do) generalize about those races and classes because they exist by default in the Core setting. Customization is a moot point. It's not a question of advanced theology. It's merely a question of, "Does Melora / Tyr / Bane exist and are assertions to the contrary reasonable?" Arguing the [b]nature[/b] of these so-called "gods" is a completely different kettle of fish from the absolutist assertion that they simply [b]don't exist[/b]. As with most things, people accept the greater body of testimony of those who've gained verification themselves - unless they have another rational cause to call that into question. In the question of the existence of, say, Melora and Asmodeus, no one has a rational basis to contradict the clerics' assertion that they exist. There exist (and have existed for thousands of years) third parties with the power to fact-check the existence of gods and the disposition of souls. Despite the means, no one's built the case for the contrary position. That's a separate debate over the nature of these so-called "gods" that [b]do[/b] exist. People can call it "pragmatic atheism," (to act under the assumption of atheism in practice) but asserting that's "a kind of atheism" is just a semantic game. Furthermore the "no one can know and it wouldn't be worth knowing," agnostic premise from apatheism simply doesn't hold up in the setting. There's a [B]huge[/B] distinction between "I don't care about the existence of Tempus" / "Tempus exists but is unworthy" and the position that "Tempus doesn't / may not exist." Irreligion ("I care not of the gods") and atheism ("Gods don't exist") are not the same. It's perfectly tenable (if perhaps impractical due to afterlife concerns) to take an irreligious position in the Forgotten Realms. It's pretty much insane for anyone but the most ignorant to assert proper atheism, or even agnosticism. The point you've missed is that these competing clerics [b]don't deny the existence of their rivals in the pantheon[/b]. The question of "which god is best" or "are any of these gods worth worshiping" is completely beside the point of "do these gods even exist?" I've noted, exhaustively now, that rejecting the qualifications of these "gods" (irreligion) is a vastly more reasonable position for an inhabitant of Oerth or Faerun than the bald assertion that such beings are simply make-believe (pure atheism) and all the clerics and wizards are just in on the conspiracy (delusional psychosis). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Atheism in DnD
Top