Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
attacking without attacking
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ColdHeart" data-source="post: 4961951" data-attributes="member: 85753"><p>Further discussion why I think using DLS and other similar powers is not against the rules but very much within the wording of the rules.</p><p></p><p>The main point Draco likes to make is "Target: One Creature" <em>must</em> be a creature you can think of which could be within the vacinity of where you are. Now firstly, if this was the case where are the rules or guidelines indicating what creatures are considered valid for this? The DMG covers bags of rats and "allies <> army", but I've not seen or heard of anything about "a creature you met 2 days ago and threatened to kill you is not a valid target of a power so you may attack an empty square". And to me, this is the first indication he maybe wrong.</p><p></p><p>Futhermore, what is "One creature"? Well, if a power hits "all creatures in AoE" it will affect all Enemies and all Allies. So A Creature can be An Enemy or An Ally. </p><p></p><p>Now PHB272 specifically states <em>instead</em> of targetting an enemy, you can target a square. Instead is a key-word here and means you can substitute an enemy with a square. And being as "an enemy" counts as "one creature" then the requisite of targetting "one creature" can be met by targetting "one square". Also this is a complete substitution. At no point does it imply that you still need a threat who you believe to be in the square.</p><p></p><p>Now for people who say "targetting a square is only a means of targetting an invisible enemy". Where does it specifically and explicitly state this? The closest clue would be the next line which states targetting a square is <em>useful </em>for attacking invisible targets. However it does not state "can only be used for", so it is an example of when you would want to do this.</p><p></p><p>I will now point out 2 further examples where this tactic is useful:</p><p></p><p>A ranger walks into an empty room. He senses something is wrong with the room, but is unsure what. He uses a power that lets him fire his bow at multiple targets (Target: 1, 2 or 3 creatures). He targets 3 corners of the room (3 squares) and fires his arrow. 2 of the arrows burst into flame before they hit the target, indicating the room is not as safe as it looked.</p><p></p><p>Imagine a room with this monster layout:</p><p></p><p>-----</p><p>-x---</p><p>---x-</p><p>-x---</p><p>-----</p><p></p><p>and an attack power which goes something like this:</p><p></p><p>Range 10</p><p>Target: One Creature</p><p>Attack: Int vs Reflex</p><p>Hit: 2D6 + Int damage</p><p>Make secondary attacks against all creatures adjacent to the primary target.</p><p>Attack: Int vs Reflex</p><p>Hit: 1D6 + Int damage</p><p></p><p>Now, going by the rule "a square = one creature" I can target the centre square with the primary attack, hit nothing, then make secondary attacks against all 3 enemy. Going by the alternative rule, I could only make a primary attack against a single target and get no secondary attacks.</p><p></p><p>So the wording indicates, to me at least, that any attack targetting at "one creature" can happily target "a square" without any further requirements. Any power with a hit/miss effect has no further effect unless there is an actual target in that area. However any further effects of the power continue to happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ColdHeart, post: 4961951, member: 85753"] Further discussion why I think using DLS and other similar powers is not against the rules but very much within the wording of the rules. The main point Draco likes to make is "Target: One Creature" [I]must[/I] be a creature you can think of which could be within the vacinity of where you are. Now firstly, if this was the case where are the rules or guidelines indicating what creatures are considered valid for this? The DMG covers bags of rats and "allies <> army", but I've not seen or heard of anything about "a creature you met 2 days ago and threatened to kill you is not a valid target of a power so you may attack an empty square". And to me, this is the first indication he maybe wrong. Futhermore, what is "One creature"? Well, if a power hits "all creatures in AoE" it will affect all Enemies and all Allies. So A Creature can be An Enemy or An Ally. Now PHB272 specifically states [I]instead[/I] of targetting an enemy, you can target a square. Instead is a key-word here and means you can substitute an enemy with a square. And being as "an enemy" counts as "one creature" then the requisite of targetting "one creature" can be met by targetting "one square". Also this is a complete substitution. At no point does it imply that you still need a threat who you believe to be in the square. Now for people who say "targetting a square is only a means of targetting an invisible enemy". Where does it specifically and explicitly state this? The closest clue would be the next line which states targetting a square is [I]useful [/I]for attacking invisible targets. However it does not state "can only be used for", so it is an example of when you would want to do this. I will now point out 2 further examples where this tactic is useful: A ranger walks into an empty room. He senses something is wrong with the room, but is unsure what. He uses a power that lets him fire his bow at multiple targets (Target: 1, 2 or 3 creatures). He targets 3 corners of the room (3 squares) and fires his arrow. 2 of the arrows burst into flame before they hit the target, indicating the room is not as safe as it looked. Imagine a room with this monster layout: ----- -x--- ---x- -x--- ----- and an attack power which goes something like this: Range 10 Target: One Creature Attack: Int vs Reflex Hit: 2D6 + Int damage Make secondary attacks against all creatures adjacent to the primary target. Attack: Int vs Reflex Hit: 1D6 + Int damage Now, going by the rule "a square = one creature" I can target the centre square with the primary attack, hit nothing, then make secondary attacks against all 3 enemy. Going by the alternative rule, I could only make a primary attack against a single target and get no secondary attacks. So the wording indicates, to me at least, that any attack targetting at "one creature" can happily target "a square" without any further requirements. Any power with a hit/miss effect has no further effect unless there is an actual target in that area. However any further effects of the power continue to happen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
attacking without attacking
Top