Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="payn" data-source="post: 9713198" data-attributes="member: 90374">Yeah.Usually in how they approach problem solving. The three pillar lens of Social, exploration, and combat is how I generally tend to look at it. Each game leans in different ways, but often thats the spread. As many as I can. Games that lack numerous attributes and skills I tend to not find much interest in. Clever in mechanical and tangible ways, clueless in reading situations in high context manner.I'd view it similar to my take on the D&D character. Obviously, adjusting with whatever flavor of SW the table is using.While I like this exercise in theory, I tend to caution against telling people what their stats mean about their characters. The above is what the character means to me, but perhaps the others at the table see it differently. I let the mechanics do the judging. I know some folks are worried about the min/maxer who dumps charisma but claims to be a super model, but when im in the GM seat, they get no mechanical benefit for declaring such. That hasnt been a problem in a very long time.</blockquote>