Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Attunement Overload: What Level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7073378" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>That in itself is not a bug, it's supposed to be a feature.</p><p></p><p>To be a problem, a player must have acquired more than three items of comparable strength and that it feels appropriate that all four (five etc) should be useable at the same time.</p><p></p><p>This simply does not happen very much if you run published modules - they have considerably less loot than either the random DMG tables yield or what prev-edition modules give out.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>In all the cases where the fourth item is clearly inferior to the other three it's an obvious solution to simply drop the weaker item. In all cases where the player agrees it might be a bit too much to be allowed all four powerful items at the same time, the rules work as intended.</p><p></p><p>I would say any houserule should aim for the remaining situations: such as when a character have brought along a family heirloom since perhaps level 1, and now at mid- to high level, that item can no longer compete for one of the three attunement slots. In this case the restriction is in the way of the story, and there is a real issue.</p><p></p><p>My suggestion is to allow a player to "split" one attunement slot into two low-power slot halves. That is, instead of attuning to one item of any power, you can use that slot to attune to two items of sufficiently lower power (as determined by player and GM). </p><p></p><p>Hint: Things that give universal bonuses (such as +1 to attacks, AC, saves etc) should never be considered "lesser", unless a very good reason (such as "using it is part of my identity" of family heirlooms above). The fact the bonus is "only" +1 instead of +2 or +3 is oterhwise not a good reason to allow it. Lesser items are items like Brooch of Shielding and Boots of Jumping that target low-level game effects (at higher levels Magic Missiles cease to be an issue, and people prefer flight/levitation/teleportation over mundane jumps and climbs). Another lesser item could be something that provides resistance to fire only, when other items start providing multiple benefits: resistance to A, B and C; or both resistance and +1 to AC for instance.</p><p></p><p>A player can then choose between attuning to 3 major items, or 6 minor items, or any combination thereof.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7073378, member: 12731"] That in itself is not a bug, it's supposed to be a feature. To be a problem, a player must have acquired more than three items of comparable strength and that it feels appropriate that all four (five etc) should be useable at the same time. This simply does not happen very much if you run published modules - they have considerably less loot than either the random DMG tables yield or what prev-edition modules give out. --- In all the cases where the fourth item is clearly inferior to the other three it's an obvious solution to simply drop the weaker item. In all cases where the player agrees it might be a bit too much to be allowed all four powerful items at the same time, the rules work as intended. I would say any houserule should aim for the remaining situations: such as when a character have brought along a family heirloom since perhaps level 1, and now at mid- to high level, that item can no longer compete for one of the three attunement slots. In this case the restriction is in the way of the story, and there is a real issue. My suggestion is to allow a player to "split" one attunement slot into two low-power slot halves. That is, instead of attuning to one item of any power, you can use that slot to attune to two items of sufficiently lower power (as determined by player and GM). Hint: Things that give universal bonuses (such as +1 to attacks, AC, saves etc) should never be considered "lesser", unless a very good reason (such as "using it is part of my identity" of family heirlooms above). The fact the bonus is "only" +1 instead of +2 or +3 is oterhwise not a good reason to allow it. Lesser items are items like Brooch of Shielding and Boots of Jumping that target low-level game effects (at higher levels Magic Missiles cease to be an issue, and people prefer flight/levitation/teleportation over mundane jumps and climbs). Another lesser item could be something that provides resistance to fire only, when other items start providing multiple benefits: resistance to A, B and C; or both resistance and +1 to AC for instance. A player can then choose between attuning to 3 major items, or 6 minor items, or any combination thereof. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Attunement Overload: What Level?
Top