Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 6623085" data-attributes="member: 2011">In a campaign like mine where quite a few magic items are handed out, a feat like Sensitive becomes a must have feat for many players. It basically becomes a feat tax and punishes the players for me handing out a bunch of attunement items. Kind of like the opposite of fun.In a campaign where the DM hands out 1 or fewer attunement magic items total to the group per level, a feat like Sensitive becomes a never take feat except maybe at a real high levels.I tend to avoid feat solutions to campaign style mechanics issues because they can be either great or lousy depending on campaign, and because it puts the burden of campaign style on the players instead of in house rules where such modifications belong. But, thanks for the suggestion anyway.I was also toying with the idea of having a relatively easy to create magic item called a Ring of Attunement which would allow a PC to have an additional attuned item. This gives the players a choice (like you suggest), but the investment is in magic item creation time and expense, not in a feat slot. But although this gives the PCs an outlet for their gold and such, it still feels like penalizing them with a gold/time tax just because I like handing out items. But I could see the concept of a Ring of Attunement (uncommon, 1 more slot), a Greater Ring of Attunement (rare, 2 more slots), etc. But meh.</blockquote>