Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 1070273" data-attributes="member: 8158">That comment of mine you're responding to says outright that reasons of game-logic are too argumentative to be worth dwelling on, and it should rather be examined on its value as a game mechanic. /deep-throated, condescending tone onPerhaps you didn't READ my post, but if you did it's VERY clear you did not COMPREHEND it./deep-throated, condescending tone off(pretty obnoxious ain't it? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )OK, you don't have a problem with it. Do you see an actual point to it though? Isn't just establishing a rule that casters can't prepare spells more than once every 24 hours sufficient (not to mention less cumbersome)? I already covered the pacing problems in an above post with regards to having no real choice but to allow for periodic 8+ hour time-sink, no matter what other circumstances or deadlines an adventure dictates. Review, read, comprehend, refute, inflame, etc. No, again, see previous post please.Hmm. Seems you've gotten so fired up about haranguing me on my profound disappointment with AU resurrection that you're not up to speed with my minor greivance about the 8-hour recharge lol. Promise or no, it seems like an odd choice to keep this particular PHB artifact if a guy's re-inventing the entire magic system. He should just keep the good stuff.If everyone casting from the same basic, homogeneous list equates to flexibility, then I guess so. I know I know...greatest thing since sliced bread...failure to comprehend...yadda yadda. I'll wait 'til the honeymoon's over to see how this all pans out.Like I said, pretty obnoxious.See my comments in <a href="http://enworld.cyberstreet.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=60229&perpage=40&pagenumber=4" target="_blank">the other thread</a> about this dubious defense (and reply there please, if you must). Or don't, whatever. My interest in the topic has cooled considerably since Monte chimed in himself. [/B]</blockquote>This is a big reason why I'd rather keep this on the other thread, because I'm responding to comments I already addressed a day or two ago with Volcivar. See for yourself: And here you've done the same. Only the last sentence is "relevant" for some reason.Hmm. That actually sounds like potentially more classes than are capable of casting Resurrection in the PHB, does it not? That's probably best.Yes, I agree--it puts quite a dent in the coinpurse!Feh. So they lug their coinpurse over to a mercantile magister's place of business instead some idealistic greenbond's grass hut. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Scars, huh? Yeah, I like those hero points! I'll be trying to start a campaign up this weekend, and I'll see how this all pans out. Actually made a note or two based off of these threads, much thanks.[/QUOTE]

Verification