Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Avascular Mass
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="veritas681" data-source="post: 5364996" data-attributes="member: 97696"><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">Tonight, a friend and I discussed a hypothetical scenario in which Avascular Mass and Mirror Image are used. The summarized point-counterpoint went as follows:</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">We are in a 20x20 room, and we are about to engage in combat. I cast Mirror Image. He casts Avascular Mass at "me." I postulate that pending successful RNG results, his ray goes through an Image, dispels it, and then fizzles.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">He contests that the web effect should still take place, because the text of the spell implies that the only reason the spell would fizzle is if it was being used on an ooze or plant. To that end, he suggests that his ray goes through my Image, strikes the wall behind it, and procs the web effect. If that is insufficient, he will simply avoid targetting "me" altogether and target a wall with the goal in mind of spawning the web effect and skipping the stun and health-halving effects of the spell altogether so he can use it to proc the area-effect and dispel all my Images at once. His bottom line is that the web effect is not dependent on the ray successfully hitting a living target first, and the only two things that cannot be affected by the spell are oozes and plants.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">My response to that is that use of the word, "avascular," in the name of the spell, the role-play description of the spell, and sepcific wording in the final paragraph of the spell description suggest to me that the inital target of the ray must have a blood circulation system and be successfully struck with that ray in order for the web effect of the spell to be successfully generated. I further stipulate that oozes and plants were mentioned in the spell's description as immune to its effects because one could otherwise reasonably argue that an ooze would make a suitable webbing material and that plants have a circulation system that could be equally viable, and the writers wanted to make it clear that a target with blood was required. My bottom line is that the web effect is entirely dependent on whether the ray component of the spell successfully strikes a target with a blood circulatory system.</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">For those of you who tl:dr text walls, here are our bottom line questions about the spell, Avascular Mass:</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">1) In order for the web effect of the spell to work, does the ray component need to successfully strike a target with a blood circulation system?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">2) If so, what does that mean for Undead targets? How will this affect "mostly in-tact," corporeal Undead who aren't Skeletons?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">3) Further still, would successfully striking a Mirror Image with the ray be considered a viable means of generating the web effect?</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">4) How are we to understand the spell author's intent in his mention of oozes and plants as exceptions to the spell's effects?</span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'">Thank you in advance for your replies. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="veritas681, post: 5364996, member: 97696"] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]Tonight, a friend and I discussed a hypothetical scenario in which Avascular Mass and Mirror Image are used. The summarized point-counterpoint went as follows:[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]We are in a 20x20 room, and we are about to engage in combat. I cast Mirror Image. He casts Avascular Mass at "me." I postulate that pending successful RNG results, his ray goes through an Image, dispels it, and then fizzles.[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]He contests that the web effect should still take place, because the text of the spell implies that the only reason the spell would fizzle is if it was being used on an ooze or plant. To that end, he suggests that his ray goes through my Image, strikes the wall behind it, and procs the web effect. If that is insufficient, he will simply avoid targetting "me" altogether and target a wall with the goal in mind of spawning the web effect and skipping the stun and health-halving effects of the spell altogether so he can use it to proc the area-effect and dispel all my Images at once. His bottom line is that the web effect is not dependent on the ray successfully hitting a living target first, and the only two things that cannot be affected by the spell are oozes and plants.[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]My response to that is that use of the word, "avascular," in the name of the spell, the role-play description of the spell, and sepcific wording in the final paragraph of the spell description suggest to me that the inital target of the ray must have a blood circulation system and be successfully struck with that ray in order for the web effect of the spell to be successfully generated. I further stipulate that oozes and plants were mentioned in the spell's description as immune to its effects because one could otherwise reasonably argue that an ooze would make a suitable webbing material and that plants have a circulation system that could be equally viable, and the writers wanted to make it clear that a target with blood was required. My bottom line is that the web effect is entirely dependent on whether the ray component of the spell successfully strikes a target with a blood circulatory system.[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]For those of you who tl:dr text walls, here are our bottom line questions about the spell, Avascular Mass:[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]1) In order for the web effect of the spell to work, does the ray component need to successfully strike a target with a blood circulation system?[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]2) If so, what does that mean for Undead targets? How will this affect "mostly in-tact," corporeal Undead who aren't Skeletons?[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]3) Further still, would successfully striking a Mirror Image with the ray be considered a viable means of generating the web effect?[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]4) How are we to understand the spell author's intent in his mention of oozes and plants as exceptions to the spell's effects?[/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS][/FONT] [FONT=Trebuchet MS]Thank you in advance for your replies. :heh:[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Avascular Mass
Top