Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Avenger proposal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BobTheNob" data-source="post: 5020936" data-attributes="member: 82425"><p>Before anything else, This is an idea I had for our groups game and I in no way would advise this for a wider audience. I am hoping I can get some feedback from others on whether this is a "game breaker"</p><p> </p><p>One of the key upsetting factors of the Avenger is that their ability to output damage is really based upon the ability to the the critical target number down (19 at minimum, 18 if possible) due to its leveraging against the double roll. It has been pointed out many times and numericaly verified that they lack compared to other strikers if they cannot do this (from reading lotsa optomisation forums).The unfortunate response to this has been that nearly all "effective" avenger builds involve one of two methods</p><p></p><p>* Multiclassing into a paragon that offers higher crit (e.g. Radiant servant, student of caiphon). This is just upsetting. I havent seen one avenger build that uses an avenger paragon, which is just heartbreaking. Other striker classes are fully feasible while staying true to flavor, but the Avenger is obligated to create "cheese" builds to stay in the game.</p><p>* Stack strength to get access to Weapon mastery at epic. Again, the avenger is forced to (substantially) stack a NON CLASS statistic to get a feat at epic. No other class is expected to do this, but again, if the avenger wants to stay feasible, this is what they have to do. The unfortunate part of this was that such a build had to sacrifice either Dex or Int to do so, which meant a drop in AC, which was most often offset by using leather or hide, which is no longer an option! (Nov 2009 Errata) meaning paragon cheese builds are all thats left</p><p> </p><p>Either of these paths was an unnatural approach. There is the argument that one shouldnt worry about the numbers and mechanics and should just play the character (and crit rating be damned!). I fully agree with this, but would like the avenger to be flavourfull ANF feasible.</p><p> </p><p>I therefore put forward the following proposition.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Advantages</p><p>* If you want still want to create an avenger/whatever build because that suits the flavor of your character, you can</p><p>* If you dont want to want a cheese path and still remain feasible, you can</p><p>* This kicks in in the paragon game...where the cheese generally begins</p><p>* No need to stack strength</p><p>* If you want to stack strength to be able to get weapon mastery at epic (and therefore able to apply crit rating to a far broader set of circumstance), go for it. Just retrain.</p><p>* Its not a crit vs everything, just to that oath of emnity scenario, meaning that it is a situational boost to the avengers striker role.</p><p> </p><p>So, any feedback from fellow dm's?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BobTheNob, post: 5020936, member: 82425"] Before anything else, This is an idea I had for our groups game and I in no way would advise this for a wider audience. I am hoping I can get some feedback from others on whether this is a "game breaker" One of the key upsetting factors of the Avenger is that their ability to output damage is really based upon the ability to the the critical target number down (19 at minimum, 18 if possible) due to its leveraging against the double roll. It has been pointed out many times and numericaly verified that they lack compared to other strikers if they cannot do this (from reading lotsa optomisation forums).The unfortunate response to this has been that nearly all "effective" avenger builds involve one of two methods * Multiclassing into a paragon that offers higher crit (e.g. Radiant servant, student of caiphon). This is just upsetting. I havent seen one avenger build that uses an avenger paragon, which is just heartbreaking. Other striker classes are fully feasible while staying true to flavor, but the Avenger is obligated to create "cheese" builds to stay in the game. * Stack strength to get access to Weapon mastery at epic. Again, the avenger is forced to (substantially) stack a NON CLASS statistic to get a feat at epic. No other class is expected to do this, but again, if the avenger wants to stay feasible, this is what they have to do. The unfortunate part of this was that such a build had to sacrifice either Dex or Int to do so, which meant a drop in AC, which was most often offset by using leather or hide, which is no longer an option! (Nov 2009 Errata) meaning paragon cheese builds are all thats left Either of these paths was an unnatural approach. There is the argument that one shouldnt worry about the numbers and mechanics and should just play the character (and crit rating be damned!). I fully agree with this, but would like the avenger to be flavourfull ANF feasible. I therefore put forward the following proposition. Advantages * If you want still want to create an avenger/whatever build because that suits the flavor of your character, you can * If you dont want to want a cheese path and still remain feasible, you can * This kicks in in the paragon game...where the cheese generally begins * No need to stack strength * If you want to stack strength to be able to get weapon mastery at epic (and therefore able to apply crit rating to a far broader set of circumstance), go for it. Just retrain. * Its not a crit vs everything, just to that oath of emnity scenario, meaning that it is a situational boost to the avengers striker role. So, any feedback from fellow dm's? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Avenger proposal
Top