Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 5462997" data-attributes="member: 20323">Well said. Now that I see where this is going I like Ari's proposal.My original comment was basically alluding to an organizational issue (not a problem per se) with the business model... If box #1 covers 1st thru 5th level with basic classes, and box #2 covers 6th thru 10th levels with intermediar classes, does that mean box #2 is that much larger because not only does it include the next 5 levels for the basic classes but it also includes all ten levels for the new intermediate classes... See where I'm going with this?Obviously you dont want to negate info like the lack if compatability between 4e red box and 4e core/essentials.Actually it would make sense if the basic set classes were the chassis on which the more advances "classes" (builds?) were built. So the base 4 would pretty much all strikers (the easiest role to get) flavored with a little bit of the other roles. The advanced fighter would become more and more defender-y as it leveled.</blockquote>