Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Background feats and flexibility
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dumapic" data-source="post: 9444683" data-attributes="member: 7047041"><p>I've been looking at the changes to the 2024 backgrounds, and I'm probably just going to try them as-is. But my initial impression is that they're a little too restrictive. I'm fine with the idea of restriction leading to creativity. But not necessarily when creativity leads to having skills and feats that you'll never actually use.</p><p></p><p>For context, I'm coming at this from the standpoint of a story-leaning GM. I'm not overly interested in optimized characters, but also feel that players shouldn't be unduly punished for making story-positive choices.</p><p></p><p>My main concern is the restriction of a single origin feat per background. I suspect this will lead to players choosing the origin feat they want first, then the background that has that feat, where in 2014 D&D, they tended to lean in more on backgrounds that just made sense story-wise. For example, in an Eberron game I ran, we had a pirate sorcerer. She'd likely be a <strong>sailor</strong> in this version, which would lead to her getting the <strong>tavern brawler </strong>origin feat. I'm fairly certain that our sorcerer didn't make a single melee attack all campaign, so that would have been wasted. Or she could have chosen a better origin feat for her character, which would have pushed her story in a different direction. Not necessarily bad, but I'm not a fan of having to modify your character's origin story to avoid "benefits" that don't actually benefit you.</p><p></p><p>My initial thought is to give players a choice of two origin feats per background. I did a quick pass to see what I could come up with, and here are the first few:</p><p></p><p>Acolyte: Magic Initiate (cleric) <strong>or Healer</strong></p><p>Artisan: Crafter <strong>or Skilled</strong></p><p>Charlatan: Skilled <strong>or Magic Initiate (wizard)</strong></p><p>Criminal: Alert <strong>or Lucky</strong></p><p></p><p>Now having said this, without thinking of my example above, I assigned a secondary origin feat option of <strong>musician </strong>to the <strong>sailor </strong>background. I don't know how much that would have helped my pirate sorcerer player. So it's not perfect, but it adds some flexibility.</p><p></p><p>Any thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dumapic, post: 9444683, member: 7047041"] I've been looking at the changes to the 2024 backgrounds, and I'm probably just going to try them as-is. But my initial impression is that they're a little too restrictive. I'm fine with the idea of restriction leading to creativity. But not necessarily when creativity leads to having skills and feats that you'll never actually use. For context, I'm coming at this from the standpoint of a story-leaning GM. I'm not overly interested in optimized characters, but also feel that players shouldn't be unduly punished for making story-positive choices. My main concern is the restriction of a single origin feat per background. I suspect this will lead to players choosing the origin feat they want first, then the background that has that feat, where in 2014 D&D, they tended to lean in more on backgrounds that just made sense story-wise. For example, in an Eberron game I ran, we had a pirate sorcerer. She'd likely be a [B]sailor[/B] in this version, which would lead to her getting the [B]tavern brawler [/B]origin feat. I'm fairly certain that our sorcerer didn't make a single melee attack all campaign, so that would have been wasted. Or she could have chosen a better origin feat for her character, which would have pushed her story in a different direction. Not necessarily bad, but I'm not a fan of having to modify your character's origin story to avoid "benefits" that don't actually benefit you. My initial thought is to give players a choice of two origin feats per background. I did a quick pass to see what I could come up with, and here are the first few: Acolyte: Magic Initiate (cleric) [B]or Healer[/B] Artisan: Crafter [B]or Skilled[/B] Charlatan: Skilled [B]or Magic Initiate (wizard)[/B] Criminal: Alert [B]or Lucky[/B] Now having said this, without thinking of my example above, I assigned a secondary origin feat option of [B]musician [/B]to the [B]sailor [/B]background. I don't know how much that would have helped my pirate sorcerer player. So it's not perfect, but it adds some flexibility. Any thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Background feats and flexibility
Top