Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="D+1" data-source="post: 1934389" data-attributes="member: 13654">While it IS possible to take this character concept too far (quite easily in fact) it is precisely the kind of character that disproves the OP's own initial concerns about paladins.  This concept is about as rough-around-the-edges as you can be and still BE a paladin.  But what's wrong with choosing that as a starting point and working steadily toward that shining-beacon-of-virtue whereas most people seem to want to start with EVERY paladin as s.b.o.v.'s and then look for opportunities to go all Anakin/Vader on us?There's one in every crowd isn't there? :\  That is strictly a player problem.  It's the kind of player who chooses a completely antithetical character concept for what we can only assume to be a play for attention-by-disruption.  If you have a LG party nobody has the right to screw up the game by choosing to play a CE Assassin and claiming it's a "roleplaying choice".This is a character designed to improve with time, not degrade with time.  You have FAR less to fear from the character than the character does from YOU looking for reasons to drag him down or keep him down.  Given the players perspective on the concept I'd think it would take LESS monitoring than the usual paladin because as a paladin he nowhere to go but up and it's in the players own interests to see to it he moves that direction.Put it this way:"Have you ever killed anyone?""Yes.  But they were all bad."<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification