Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 8104141" data-attributes="member: 6855114">I was replying to this garbage you wrote:A shield does not do that or if it does it is specified in the shield's description. A +x shield does not do any of things you mentionned in either the general rule or the specific rule about shields. So my reply makes a lot of sense. Did you actually read it?As for your experience in wielding a shield... You should then know how a shield works. To have said the above tells me you do not. Magic has always been assumed to enhance or to facilitate an object's ease of use or its durability. At least, that is what fantasy, lore and D&D assumed and still assume up to this day. When an enchantment does something else, it is always written in the specific item's description. It is not MY preference as you said, but how it has always been from the start. So yep, I read your comment and did not find anything that was remotely logical or sensical in it.Lastly, you may not like Shadiversity, but it does not entitle you to belittle him in anyways. Unless you do research too? If so would you care to do rebuttal vids about the vids Shad's done for the past years to prove him wrong? (And when he is proven wrong, btw, he admits it. Which is way better than a lot of persons on the internet or IRL that I know).Stop acting like a fan and use your logic to actually think about the ruling with shields. Before this SA, would you really have allowed this crap at your table? Really???? Your comments are usually much better (way better) than what you have given us in this thread.</blockquote>

Verification