Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bad Sage Advice?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8104345" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>The problem with claims like this is there is really no way to prove (or disprove) it. IMO unless you are a riot police, etc. or stuntman or professionally reenact battles or something, there aren't many places out there where people are have a call for shield proficiency skills anymore. Even in those outlier professions, your ability to use a shield effectively would likely differ (perhaps significantly?) from what a warrior would have done IRL hundreds of years ago. <em>shrug</em></p><p></p><p>Anyway, there are tons of things in the game the rules don't specifically address (which is intentional of course) so common sense should prevail for your table and you can either:</p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Ignore the SA and make it that magical shields must be donned to add <em>any</em> bonus, even the magical one.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Treat the magic of the shield as an extension (via whatever flavor you want) beyond the shield so merely holding one in your hand "magically" makes you harder to hit.</li> </ol><p>Personally, I go with route #1. JC is (effectively) ruling in favor of option #2. I don't agree with it, and my table did enjoy a hardy laugh at the ruling. One player even commented on a funny comic to show how... well, <em>strange</em> might be the nicest word... the second interpretation is.</p><p></p><p>To be clear, I'm not arguing that JC's strict reading of the text is inaccurate in any way... just strange IMO and he would have been better served acknowledging the likely initial intent of the text--that the shield must be equipped/donned--instead of just reading the current text literally.</p><p></p><p></p><p>While I find the depth to which some of us will go in defending our positions--I must admit I often chuckle at others when they continue debates beyond what I would call rational. Of course, I hope and expect others get a laugh from me sometimes, as well. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8104345, member: 6987520"] The problem with claims like this is there is really no way to prove (or disprove) it. IMO unless you are a riot police, etc. or stuntman or professionally reenact battles or something, there aren't many places out there where people are have a call for shield proficiency skills anymore. Even in those outlier professions, your ability to use a shield effectively would likely differ (perhaps significantly?) from what a warrior would have done IRL hundreds of years ago. [I]shrug[/I] Anyway, there are tons of things in the game the rules don't specifically address (which is intentional of course) so common sense should prevail for your table and you can either: [LIST=1] [*]Ignore the SA and make it that magical shields must be donned to add [I]any[/I] bonus, even the magical one. [*]Treat the magic of the shield as an extension (via whatever flavor you want) beyond the shield so merely holding one in your hand "magically" makes you harder to hit. [/LIST] Personally, I go with route #1. JC is (effectively) ruling in favor of option #2. I don't agree with it, and my table did enjoy a hardy laugh at the ruling. One player even commented on a funny comic to show how... well, [I]strange[/I] might be the nicest word... the second interpretation is. To be clear, I'm not arguing that JC's strict reading of the text is inaccurate in any way... just strange IMO and he would have been better served acknowledging the likely initial intent of the text--that the shield must be equipped/donned--instead of just reading the current text literally. While I find the depth to which some of us will go in defending our positions--I must admit I often chuckle at others when they continue debates beyond what I would call rational. Of course, I hope and expect others get a laugh from me sometimes, as well. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bad Sage Advice?
Top