Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balance throughout the game line?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6288375" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>There is nothing balanced to begin with. Pathfinder basically set itself up as the replacement 3.X system. Therefore, they pretty much had to keep 3.X's system expectations if they were going to sell their product. They also I think correctly realized that balance was never the highest priority of people playing 3.5 anyway and that if everything was broken, then nothing basically was, so they basically just went gonzo and threw kitchen sinks of powers at things and left it up to the tables to sort it out on the theory that the players would be happy and the DMs could deal with it - it's not like the point of DMing is winning anyway, and from a DM perspective, characters that can't die aren't all bad.</p><p></p><p>It's works in so far as it goes, but it keeps all the problems of 3.5 including poor balance.</p><p></p><p>I'd like to see a tighter version of the rules far Pathfinder 2.0, but why mess with a formula that is working?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6288375, member: 4937"] There is nothing balanced to begin with. Pathfinder basically set itself up as the replacement 3.X system. Therefore, they pretty much had to keep 3.X's system expectations if they were going to sell their product. They also I think correctly realized that balance was never the highest priority of people playing 3.5 anyway and that if everything was broken, then nothing basically was, so they basically just went gonzo and threw kitchen sinks of powers at things and left it up to the tables to sort it out on the theory that the players would be happy and the DMs could deal with it - it's not like the point of DMing is winning anyway, and from a DM perspective, characters that can't die aren't all bad. It's works in so far as it goes, but it keeps all the problems of 3.5 including poor balance. I'd like to see a tighter version of the rules far Pathfinder 2.0, but why mess with a formula that is working? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balance throughout the game line?
Top