Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing double-encounters?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr_Ruminahui" data-source="post: 5262390" data-attributes="member: 81104"><p>I agree with Infiniti2000 - it's difficult to determine what "mark down" in XP is appropriate for a given encounter... especially as a blanket assessment. Rather, its one that needs to be done in assessing the strengths of the party in relation to the encounter.</p><p> </p><p>For example, an encounter with 10 minions is likely easier than one with 2 waves of 5. This would be especially true if the only area/close damaging powers the party has are per encounter (for example, a party rely on their dragonborn's breath). This may change depending on how the minions are placed... for example, 10 archer minions scattered across the table behind cover/dangerous terrain are much more dangerous than 10 melee minions clumped in the open.</p><p> </p><p>That said, I do believe that generally 2 waves of x monsters is less challenging than one wave of 2x monsters... though, again, that can depend on terrain, and the players specific powers. How MUCH less challenging will depend on various factors, which really can only be assessed by looking at the encounters itself.</p><p> </p><p>Additionally, it may be worthwhile considering your XP budget as a whole - for example, perhaps you intend to run 4800 XP in an adventuring day for a 4 person level 8 party. You could do it as 4 waves of n-2 (1500 XP ea), which is roughly an n+7 encounter if they were to fight them all at the same time. Or you could run it as an n-1 (1200 XP), an n+1 (1600 XP) and an n+2 (2000 XP) with rests between them.</p><p> </p><p>Now... which is more difficult? Again, it depends... with the low XP waves, the players may be able to pile on the enemies and prevent much of the damage they might be caused. additionally (especially if the enemy's need to come to them), the fact they can keep their dailies up for multiple waves may help make up for the fact they aren't regenerating powers. If you give action points for the waves as if they were encounters (especially if you go with even smaller waves than n-1), that also might make up for things.</p><p> </p><p>One thing this thread has made me consider is running a chase scene I have planned as a series of mini-waves in the same encounter rather than artificially inserting short rests into it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr_Ruminahui, post: 5262390, member: 81104"] I agree with Infiniti2000 - it's difficult to determine what "mark down" in XP is appropriate for a given encounter... especially as a blanket assessment. Rather, its one that needs to be done in assessing the strengths of the party in relation to the encounter. For example, an encounter with 10 minions is likely easier than one with 2 waves of 5. This would be especially true if the only area/close damaging powers the party has are per encounter (for example, a party rely on their dragonborn's breath). This may change depending on how the minions are placed... for example, 10 archer minions scattered across the table behind cover/dangerous terrain are much more dangerous than 10 melee minions clumped in the open. That said, I do believe that generally 2 waves of x monsters is less challenging than one wave of 2x monsters... though, again, that can depend on terrain, and the players specific powers. How MUCH less challenging will depend on various factors, which really can only be assessed by looking at the encounters itself. Additionally, it may be worthwhile considering your XP budget as a whole - for example, perhaps you intend to run 4800 XP in an adventuring day for a 4 person level 8 party. You could do it as 4 waves of n-2 (1500 XP ea), which is roughly an n+7 encounter if they were to fight them all at the same time. Or you could run it as an n-1 (1200 XP), an n+1 (1600 XP) and an n+2 (2000 XP) with rests between them. Now... which is more difficult? Again, it depends... with the low XP waves, the players may be able to pile on the enemies and prevent much of the damage they might be caused. additionally (especially if the enemy's need to come to them), the fact they can keep their dailies up for multiple waves may help make up for the fact they aren't regenerating powers. If you give action points for the waves as if they were encounters (especially if you go with even smaller waves than n-1), that also might make up for things. One thing this thread has made me consider is running a chase scene I have planned as a series of mini-waves in the same encounter rather than artificially inserting short rests into it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing double-encounters?
Top