Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Balancing "RP" and "G"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Shaman" data-source="post: 2744887" data-attributes="member: 26473"><p>Gather Information, Diplomacy, Intimidate, and Bluff do not inhibit roleplay, nor can they be used to the exclusion of roleplay.</p><p></p><p>Gather Information reveals "a feel for the major news items in a neighborhood," or put another way, local gossip. It is not a Google search. If there is no reason for local gossip to include a reference to the BBEG, for example, then no result will produce useable information. It also carries with it a time restriction - if the adventurers don't have the time to invest to make the rounds of the local watering holes, then the skill an't be used, but this in no way prevents them from attempting to walk into a bar and have a conversation with the bartender.</p><p></p><p>That brings us to Diplomacy, which is used to change a character's attitude toward the diplomat - it is not <em>charm person</em> or <em>dominate</em>, nor is it a means of getting a character to say yes to anything and everything that the adventurers want. According to the skill description in the MSRD, a Helpful character will take risks on behalf of the diplomatic character, providing protection, back up, healing, or aid. Exactly how that assistance is offered is not specified, but there's no reason to assume based on the description that a character would perform an act that is against its allegiances or alignment, for example, which may prescribe exactly what sort of aid or protection is available. There are also significant limits on how the skill can be used, such as a minimum of full round action up to whatever the GM deems reasonable.</p><p></p><p>So now we come to Intimidate, which like Diplomacy is subject to a number of significant constraints: "Circumstances dramatically affect the effectiveness of an Intimidate check. There are limits to what a successful Intimidate check can do. The character can't force someone to obey his or her every command or do something that endangers that person's life." Bluff is similarly constrained.</p><p></p><p>Here's the crux of how these skills work in game: they are not used to replace roleplaying, but to guide it. As GM, I don't tell the player making the Diplomacy check, "Okay, the mayor is now friendly to you. What do you want him to do?" - I roleplay the mayor's reactions, listen to the character's requests, weigh them in light of the mayor's convictions and abilities, and determine what aid, protection, or whatever he is able to provide. A Gather Information check leads to an encounter in a smoky backroom where a pool hustler is holding court, dispensing tidbits on the local scene - the players have the opportunity to ask additional question, or may have to decipher details about the information gathered.</p><p></p><p>The point is, the so-called social skills of d20 games do not preclude roleplaying - under a set of limited circumstances, they provide a source of guidance on how to roleplay a character in light of an adventurer's skills. This is hardly mere dice-rolling.Where you see "power and control," I see a social contract that says, "This is a game. Play fair."I grew up with those same games as well - the ninety-odd pages of <em>Top Secret</em>, the sixty-some pages of <em>Boot Hill</em>, the dozen or so pages of <em>Melee</em>. All great games, no question.</p><p></p><p>Whether a game has a lot of rules or only a few, the rules exist to do one thing: resolve the element of chance. They create a set of probabilities, to guide the description of the action based on the roll of the dice. My approach to this as GM is to assign those probabilities at the beginning of the adventure, and to stand by them when the dice hit the tabletop. And this means accepting a simple rule: Improbability Happens.</p><p></p><p>I would ask one thing of GMs who fudge in order to maintain the story, the characters' place in the game-world, to blunt improbable outcomes, or whatever: tell your players <u>up</u> <u>front</u> that this may occur. Don't lie to your players and cheat them out of the satisfaction of their successes by allowing them to think that the events of the game broke their way on the roll of the dice, that their improbable success was really the result of the GM tipping the scales.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Shaman, post: 2744887, member: 26473"] Gather Information, Diplomacy, Intimidate, and Bluff do not inhibit roleplay, nor can they be used to the exclusion of roleplay. Gather Information reveals "a feel for the major news items in a neighborhood," or put another way, local gossip. It is not a Google search. If there is no reason for local gossip to include a reference to the BBEG, for example, then no result will produce useable information. It also carries with it a time restriction - if the adventurers don't have the time to invest to make the rounds of the local watering holes, then the skill an't be used, but this in no way prevents them from attempting to walk into a bar and have a conversation with the bartender. That brings us to Diplomacy, which is used to change a character's attitude toward the diplomat - it is not [i]charm person[/i] or [i]dominate[/i], nor is it a means of getting a character to say yes to anything and everything that the adventurers want. According to the skill description in the MSRD, a Helpful character will take risks on behalf of the diplomatic character, providing protection, back up, healing, or aid. Exactly how that assistance is offered is not specified, but there's no reason to assume based on the description that a character would perform an act that is against its allegiances or alignment, for example, which may prescribe exactly what sort of aid or protection is available. There are also significant limits on how the skill can be used, such as a minimum of full round action up to whatever the GM deems reasonable. So now we come to Intimidate, which like Diplomacy is subject to a number of significant constraints: "Circumstances dramatically affect the effectiveness of an Intimidate check. There are limits to what a successful Intimidate check can do. The character can't force someone to obey his or her every command or do something that endangers that person's life." Bluff is similarly constrained. Here's the crux of how these skills work in game: they are not used to replace roleplaying, but to guide it. As GM, I don't tell the player making the Diplomacy check, "Okay, the mayor is now friendly to you. What do you want him to do?" - I roleplay the mayor's reactions, listen to the character's requests, weigh them in light of the mayor's convictions and abilities, and determine what aid, protection, or whatever he is able to provide. A Gather Information check leads to an encounter in a smoky backroom where a pool hustler is holding court, dispensing tidbits on the local scene - the players have the opportunity to ask additional question, or may have to decipher details about the information gathered. The point is, the so-called social skills of d20 games do not preclude roleplaying - under a set of limited circumstances, they provide a source of guidance on how to roleplay a character in light of an adventurer's skills. This is hardly mere dice-rolling.Where you see "power and control," I see a social contract that says, "This is a game. Play fair."I grew up with those same games as well - the ninety-odd pages of [i]Top Secret[/i], the sixty-some pages of [i]Boot Hill[/i], the dozen or so pages of [i]Melee[/i]. All great games, no question. Whether a game has a lot of rules or only a few, the rules exist to do one thing: resolve the element of chance. They create a set of probabilities, to guide the description of the action based on the roll of the dice. My approach to this as GM is to assign those probabilities at the beginning of the adventure, and to stand by them when the dice hit the tabletop. And this means accepting a simple rule: Improbability Happens. I would ask one thing of GMs who fudge in order to maintain the story, the characters' place in the game-world, to blunt improbable outcomes, or whatever: tell your players [U]up[/U] [U]front[/U] that this may occur. Don't lie to your players and cheat them out of the satisfaction of their successes by allowing them to think that the events of the game broke their way on the roll of the dice, that their improbable success was really the result of the GM tipping the scales. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Balancing "RP" and "G"
Top