Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing Single-Attack Powers with Multi-Attack Powers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zelc" data-source="post: 4577539" data-attributes="member: 40496"><p><strong>Option 0: comrade raoul's fix</strong></p><p><u>Suggested Houserule:</u></p><p>All non-Ranger at-will or encounter powers that hit more than once must be made against separate targets. Non-Ranger multi-attack encounter powers that have an effect resulting from hitting the same target more than once are instead bumped up to a Daily power of the next tier of dailies and can hit the same target more than once (may need to be given Miss: Half Damage?).</p><p></p><p><u>Why:</u></p><p>Well, spreading damage out amongst multiple targets is far less objectionable and powerful than massive damage against one target. This is also very simple and doesn't mess with the math behind monster HPs and such. However, this doesn't do anything about the extremely high Ranger DPR.</p><p></p><p><strong>Option 1: Monster resistances</strong></p><p><u>Suggested Houserule:</u></p><p>Cut monster HP by some percent (20% as a guesstimate?), give them more resist all at the enhancement bonus levels:</p><p></p><p>Resist All (stacks with other resistances):</p><p>Monster Lvl 01: +1</p><p>Monster Lvl 06: +2</p><p>Monster Lvl 11: +3</p><p>Monster Lvl 16: +4</p><p>Monster Lvl 21: +5</p><p>Monster Lvl 26: +6</p><p></p><p><u>Why:</u></p><p>Basically, your weapon's enhancement bonus is canceled out by the higher resistances, so the enhancement bonus is equally effective for single-attack powers and multi-attack powers. Multi-attack powers still gain more benefit from Weapon Focus (oh well). However, multi-attack powers still synergize better with stuff that grant vulnerabilities (Lasting Frost should be nerfed, but there's always power-imposed vulnerabilities). Plus, there's Irresistible Flame and Flaming weapons. Meh.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Option 2: Apply non-power damage bonuses once per creature per power per round</strong></p><p><u>Suggested houserule (thanks to JoeNotCharles for rewording):</u></p><p>Whenever a single action causes several melee or ranged attacks on the same target, do not roll separate damage for each attack. Instead, add up the damage given for each attack and treat this as a single damage roll. For example, Two-Fanged Strike with a ranged weapon does 1[W] + Dex modifier damage per attack, plus Wis modifier damage if both attacks hit. So if you hit once, you do 1[W] + Dex modifier damage and if you hit twice you do 2[W] + Dex modifier + Dex modifier + Wis modifier damage. Other bonuses or penalties that affect damage such as enhancement bonuses, feat bonuses, and resistances and vulnerabilities only apply once to each target.</p><p></p><p><u>Why:</u></p><p>Multi-attack powers will still benefit because people have more chances to hit, but instead of N attacks adding {damage x hit chance x N} expected damage, it now only adds {damage x [(1-(miss chance)^N)]} in expected damage. For two attacks and a 50% hit chance, each point of bonus damage adds 1 point of expected damage under the normal rules and 0.75 points of expected damage under the houserule, compared with 0.5 expected damage for a single attack power.</p><p></p><p>Also, it balances resistances against multi-attack powers. A character with multi-attack powers shouldn't be overpowered against monsters without resists and really sucky against monsters with resists.</p><p></p><p><u>More extreme version:</u></p><p>All fixed-value damage bonuses or penalties not specified in the power used is applied only on the damage roll associated with the <strong>first attack roll</strong> associated with this power against a creature per round. If the first attack roll against the target doesn't hit, the damage bonuses or penalties do not apply.</p><p></p><p>It's harder to implement and you have to ask why a monster's resists don't apply if the first attack is a miss. However, the less extreme version might not be enough to balance out multi-attack powers, this rule would make a damage bonus equally attractive to single hitters and multi hitters. Anyone volunteer to crunch the numbers <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/blush.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":blush:" title="Blush :blush:" data-shortname=":blush:" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek! :o" data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /> <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/angel.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angel:" title="Angel :angel:" data-shortname=":angel:" />? I'll try to run some when I get the time. If you use that DPR spreadsheet, just put all the bonuses into the Hunter's Quarry column and I think that should work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zelc, post: 4577539, member: 40496"] [b]Option 0: comrade raoul's fix[/b] [u]Suggested Houserule:[/u] All non-Ranger at-will or encounter powers that hit more than once must be made against separate targets. Non-Ranger multi-attack encounter powers that have an effect resulting from hitting the same target more than once are instead bumped up to a Daily power of the next tier of dailies and can hit the same target more than once (may need to be given Miss: Half Damage?). [u]Why:[/u] Well, spreading damage out amongst multiple targets is far less objectionable and powerful than massive damage against one target. This is also very simple and doesn't mess with the math behind monster HPs and such. However, this doesn't do anything about the extremely high Ranger DPR. [b]Option 1: Monster resistances[/b] [u]Suggested Houserule:[/u] Cut monster HP by some percent (20% as a guesstimate?), give them more resist all at the enhancement bonus levels: Resist All (stacks with other resistances): Monster Lvl 01: +1 Monster Lvl 06: +2 Monster Lvl 11: +3 Monster Lvl 16: +4 Monster Lvl 21: +5 Monster Lvl 26: +6 [u]Why:[/u] Basically, your weapon's enhancement bonus is canceled out by the higher resistances, so the enhancement bonus is equally effective for single-attack powers and multi-attack powers. Multi-attack powers still gain more benefit from Weapon Focus (oh well). However, multi-attack powers still synergize better with stuff that grant vulnerabilities (Lasting Frost should be nerfed, but there's always power-imposed vulnerabilities). Plus, there's Irresistible Flame and Flaming weapons. Meh. [b]Option 2: Apply non-power damage bonuses once per creature per power per round[/b] [u]Suggested houserule (thanks to JoeNotCharles for rewording):[/u] Whenever a single action causes several melee or ranged attacks on the same target, do not roll separate damage for each attack. Instead, add up the damage given for each attack and treat this as a single damage roll. For example, Two-Fanged Strike with a ranged weapon does 1[W] + Dex modifier damage per attack, plus Wis modifier damage if both attacks hit. So if you hit once, you do 1[W] + Dex modifier damage and if you hit twice you do 2[W] + Dex modifier + Dex modifier + Wis modifier damage. Other bonuses or penalties that affect damage such as enhancement bonuses, feat bonuses, and resistances and vulnerabilities only apply once to each target. [u]Why:[/u] Multi-attack powers will still benefit because people have more chances to hit, but instead of N attacks adding {damage x hit chance x N} expected damage, it now only adds {damage x [(1-(miss chance)^N)]} in expected damage. For two attacks and a 50% hit chance, each point of bonus damage adds 1 point of expected damage under the normal rules and 0.75 points of expected damage under the houserule, compared with 0.5 expected damage for a single attack power. Also, it balances resistances against multi-attack powers. A character with multi-attack powers shouldn't be overpowered against monsters without resists and really sucky against monsters with resists. [u]More extreme version:[/u] All fixed-value damage bonuses or penalties not specified in the power used is applied only on the damage roll associated with the [b]first attack roll[/b] associated with this power against a creature per round. If the first attack roll against the target doesn't hit, the damage bonuses or penalties do not apply. It's harder to implement and you have to ask why a monster's resists don't apply if the first attack is a miss. However, the less extreme version might not be enough to balance out multi-attack powers, this rule would make a damage bonus equally attractive to single hitters and multi hitters. Anyone volunteer to crunch the numbers :blush: :o :angel:? I'll try to run some when I get the time. If you use that DPR spreadsheet, just put all the bonuses into the Hunter's Quarry column and I think that should work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing Single-Attack Powers with Multi-Attack Powers
Top