Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing Starlock AC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cadfan" data-source="post: 4500077" data-attributes="member: 40961"><p>I think your feat gets the job done. Maybe not the way I'd do it, but it gets the job done.</p><p></p><p>Its a little clunky mathematically. Let me see if I can think up something that takes less thinking.</p><p></p><p>...</p><p>...</p><p></p><p>A warlock with a 14 Int will have an acceptable AC if he pumps Int. If he doesn't, he falls behind by 3 over the course of his career. He won't fall behind at all until level 8.</p><p></p><p>So... what about a paragon tier feat that boosts AC and which has prereqs that will be essentially unattainable for a star pact warlock who chooses to pump Int instead of pumping both Con and Cha?</p><p></p><p>Sideways Paths</p><p>Paragon</p><p>Prereqs: Star Pact Warlock, Con 19, Cha 19</p><p>When you gain concealment due to your Shadow Walk class feature, you gain +4 to all defenses instead of +2. At level 21, you gain +5 instead.</p><p></p><p>I really like this option. </p><p></p><p>Con and Cha of 19 are close to unattainable at the paragon tier without putting some of your discretionary points into both stats. Even a half elf would have to buy 16s in both stats, costing him 20 of his initial points and sticking him with an Int bonus of 12. He could do it more easily if he waited for this feat until epic, but that's probably fine.</p><p></p><p>Making it a paragon feat handles the timing issue pretty well. The curve isn't quite as smooth, but it should be smooth enough. Its a little frontloaded at the paragon tier, but who cares.</p><p></p><p>Best of all, its elegant to tie it to an existing class feature.</p><p></p><p>The biggest danger is that players will see it and not understand that it patches the AC issue and opens up a dual-path star pact warlock option. They'll think its just some fancy benefit. So they'll take it and continue to whine anyways about not having a free AC bonus to fix the fact that they're not pumping Int.</p><p></p><p>But I still think its a cool feat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cadfan, post: 4500077, member: 40961"] I think your feat gets the job done. Maybe not the way I'd do it, but it gets the job done. Its a little clunky mathematically. Let me see if I can think up something that takes less thinking. ... ... A warlock with a 14 Int will have an acceptable AC if he pumps Int. If he doesn't, he falls behind by 3 over the course of his career. He won't fall behind at all until level 8. So... what about a paragon tier feat that boosts AC and which has prereqs that will be essentially unattainable for a star pact warlock who chooses to pump Int instead of pumping both Con and Cha? Sideways Paths Paragon Prereqs: Star Pact Warlock, Con 19, Cha 19 When you gain concealment due to your Shadow Walk class feature, you gain +4 to all defenses instead of +2. At level 21, you gain +5 instead. I really like this option. Con and Cha of 19 are close to unattainable at the paragon tier without putting some of your discretionary points into both stats. Even a half elf would have to buy 16s in both stats, costing him 20 of his initial points and sticking him with an Int bonus of 12. He could do it more easily if he waited for this feat until epic, but that's probably fine. Making it a paragon feat handles the timing issue pretty well. The curve isn't quite as smooth, but it should be smooth enough. Its a little frontloaded at the paragon tier, but who cares. Best of all, its elegant to tie it to an existing class feature. The biggest danger is that players will see it and not understand that it patches the AC issue and opens up a dual-path star pact warlock option. They'll think its just some fancy benefit. So they'll take it and continue to whine anyways about not having a free AC bonus to fix the fact that they're not pumping Int. But I still think its a cool feat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing Starlock AC
Top