Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alceste" data-source="post: 3062802" data-attributes="member: 44467">I tend to se the warblade as the front line showman style of fighter. A warblade is self promoting and flashy (maneuvers) versus a fighter who excels at the basic mechanics (feats). The problem is without a hard core limiting factor on maneuvers in a fight, the warblade is mechanically better than a fighter. With a hard limiting factor on maneuvers, the advantage slides slightly back to a fighter in a long fight (after 6+ rounds). On the other hand, the warblade will have a slight advantage in non-combat situations. In no way will the warblade be able to dominate skill based situations in the way that bards and rogues can. The warblade will be useful, thus the player will also more be interested in non-combat situations. I do not want to replace the fighter, but rather have an alternative that has some slight advantages and disadvantages. The fighter will have a slight advantage in extremely long combats, while the warblade has a slight advantage in non-combat situations. These slight differences are what the classes interesting to me.Lol, it still not address how much I hate the d12 for an intelligence fighter. But there are alot of personal preferences in that issue.</blockquote>