Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing XP of a 3-Way Encounter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr_Ruminahui" data-source="post: 4973436" data-attributes="member: 81104"><p>Glad my post was helpful.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, I would have 1/2 directed at that faction if they ally - so it may result in fewer attacks overall versus the players if they ally. That said, if players are hammering one of the factions, that faction will focus on the players over other factions or the players' allies. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, it may or may not be possible. One way of it is to think of the geography - perhaps its a big room with 4 doors, each faction coming in through a door. At the beginning, just the faction head and a few minions (and maybe their head crony) would be in the room to start. This also allows the factions/players to have some Role Play time time screaming at each other/building tension before everything explodes. It also allows you to keep the size of the factions hidden (and therefore allows NPC bluff/intimidates to up or downplay the size of their force) - which allows you to drop hints/misinformation in the run up to the encounter.</p><p> </p><p>Or, if you don't want the size of the sides hidden, you could simply have geography dictate the sides coming in over a number of turns. For example, if it is at the top of the hill/bottom of an ampetheatre, the difficult terrain would have caused the factions to spread out and come in over a few rounds. Additionally, depending on the terrain, it might allow players to use athletics checks, etc. to delay/damage (delay is better from a book keeping perspective - perhaps a successful check means only 1/2 come in the next round, the other 1/2 delayed by 1 round) the reinforcements, by causing a rock slide or whatever might be thematically appropriate.</p><p> </p><p>You could also combine the approaches - say one faction came out of a tunnel, the others had to climb there. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I definitely agree - only make rolls versus the player - abstract everything else. Vs. minions, you do need to either make a roll (as DPR would automatically kill them) or simply only kill every other minion DPR is applied to.</p><p> </p><p>That said, I would do the DPR on a model-by-model basis - so if a model were attacking another model, you would just automatically apply the DPR. Personally, although it is much simpler, I would avoid any "all NPCs simply take x damage a round" as being a bit too abstract - rather, they should take damage based on how much they are being focused on.</p><p> </p><p>Incidentally, if you want the main NPCs to not be overly abraided by the DPR and be in better shape when the players get to them, consider giving them a way to trigger their healing surge - this may be less necessary if you make them elites or solos.</p><p> </p><p>I think the important thing is a to have a solid ruleset in place to govern how the NPCs interact, but not make that ruleset be visible to the players, so as to make the encounter seem natural and organic to them but actually have a rigid structure. From my past GMing experience (mostly Shadowrun 2nd ed.), the more chaotic you want the situation to feel for the players, the more rigid it actually needs to be constructed by the GM to avoid things from bogging down.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Anyway, I'm glad this is all helpful - feel free to press the "give XP" button on my profile. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Incidentally, if you are curious as to the encounter I ran and which I developed the DPR method for, it was 2 hated enemies who had killed each other fighting in a war long ago. The party walked into the battlefield with a powerful artifact, and this gave the 2 ghosts enough magical mojo to continue their war, with the party caught in the middle (each side thinking the party belonged to the other side). Each turn each ghost would "raise" a bunch of skeletons to fight on its side (1 minion and 1 non-minion a turn). When the players killed a ghost, that would kill all of its faction and stop the raising of new forces, but also had the remaining ghost and its faction free to all attack the players. Killing the second ghost ended the encounter.</p><p> </p><p>Unfortunately, I was a relatively new to DMing D&D at that time (players had just reached 3rd level), and it didn't occur to me to allow the players to use skills to shape the encounter - religion, insight, bluff and diplomacy all could have had interesting effects. Oh well, perhaps I can give it a different spin and try something similar later. Additionally, were it to happen again, I would have raised fewer non-minions and more minions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr_Ruminahui, post: 4973436, member: 81104"] Glad my post was helpful. Well, I would have 1/2 directed at that faction if they ally - so it may result in fewer attacks overall versus the players if they ally. That said, if players are hammering one of the factions, that faction will focus on the players over other factions or the players' allies. Well, it may or may not be possible. One way of it is to think of the geography - perhaps its a big room with 4 doors, each faction coming in through a door. At the beginning, just the faction head and a few minions (and maybe their head crony) would be in the room to start. This also allows the factions/players to have some Role Play time time screaming at each other/building tension before everything explodes. It also allows you to keep the size of the factions hidden (and therefore allows NPC bluff/intimidates to up or downplay the size of their force) - which allows you to drop hints/misinformation in the run up to the encounter. Or, if you don't want the size of the sides hidden, you could simply have geography dictate the sides coming in over a number of turns. For example, if it is at the top of the hill/bottom of an ampetheatre, the difficult terrain would have caused the factions to spread out and come in over a few rounds. Additionally, depending on the terrain, it might allow players to use athletics checks, etc. to delay/damage (delay is better from a book keeping perspective - perhaps a successful check means only 1/2 come in the next round, the other 1/2 delayed by 1 round) the reinforcements, by causing a rock slide or whatever might be thematically appropriate. You could also combine the approaches - say one faction came out of a tunnel, the others had to climb there. I definitely agree - only make rolls versus the player - abstract everything else. Vs. minions, you do need to either make a roll (as DPR would automatically kill them) or simply only kill every other minion DPR is applied to. That said, I would do the DPR on a model-by-model basis - so if a model were attacking another model, you would just automatically apply the DPR. Personally, although it is much simpler, I would avoid any "all NPCs simply take x damage a round" as being a bit too abstract - rather, they should take damage based on how much they are being focused on. Incidentally, if you want the main NPCs to not be overly abraided by the DPR and be in better shape when the players get to them, consider giving them a way to trigger their healing surge - this may be less necessary if you make them elites or solos. I think the important thing is a to have a solid ruleset in place to govern how the NPCs interact, but not make that ruleset be visible to the players, so as to make the encounter seem natural and organic to them but actually have a rigid structure. From my past GMing experience (mostly Shadowrun 2nd ed.), the more chaotic you want the situation to feel for the players, the more rigid it actually needs to be constructed by the GM to avoid things from bogging down. Anyway, I'm glad this is all helpful - feel free to press the "give XP" button on my profile. ;) Incidentally, if you are curious as to the encounter I ran and which I developed the DPR method for, it was 2 hated enemies who had killed each other fighting in a war long ago. The party walked into the battlefield with a powerful artifact, and this gave the 2 ghosts enough magical mojo to continue their war, with the party caught in the middle (each side thinking the party belonged to the other side). Each turn each ghost would "raise" a bunch of skeletons to fight on its side (1 minion and 1 non-minion a turn). When the players killed a ghost, that would kill all of its faction and stop the raising of new forces, but also had the remaining ghost and its faction free to all attack the players. Killing the second ghost ended the encounter. Unfortunately, I was a relatively new to DMing D&D at that time (players had just reached 3rd level), and it didn't occur to me to allow the players to use skills to shape the encounter - religion, insight, bluff and diplomacy all could have had interesting effects. Oh well, perhaps I can give it a different spin and try something similar later. Additionally, were it to happen again, I would have raised fewer non-minions and more minions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Balancing XP of a 3-Way Encounter
Top