Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Baldman Games & WotC On All Access Issues At Gen Con
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7678265" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>I meant the people who got the All-access pass was a small percentage of the fanbase, not that a small percentage were upset or would ask for a refund.</p><p></p><p>There are millions of gamers in the world. Only 8000+ people played D&D at GenCon. A few hundred got the All-Access pass. Of the total percentage of gamers, the people who paid the all-access price are a small, small minority of the overall population of gamers. Less than 0.01%. The point was that the companies *could* have completely ignore those fan's complaints pretty easily, and still managed to sell all their all-access tickets next year. The point was that Baldman games, let alone WotC, didn't <em>have</em> to do anything in response to the outrage. Their reaction could <em>easily</em> have been "oh well, you paid the price, <em>caveat emptor</em> bitches." Especially WotC who had little involvement in the process. </p><p></p><p>It's not like the value : cost ratio was some hidden thing. They <em>knew</em> the price when buying the ticket. It was right there. The people saw what was offered and made the choice the purchase anyway. Just like people did last year. They had to decide whether the bonus of a dedicated DM and firm table of players and maybe some small perk was worth the cost. And each of them decided to pay the extra price. </p><p>For me, this is less idle speculation. I went to GenCon last year. I looked at getting the All-Access price. And I decided that, for me, the cost was not worth it. Even thought I would have loved that early <em>Monster Manual</em>. The uncertainty and cost was too much, so I made the decision. Other people were willing and I don't fault them their bonus book. We all make our own decisions and choices. </p><p></p><p>Sure, after last year, people might have been expecting a free copy of a book or two. But that's not guaranteed. It didn't say that on the ticket. You can't blame the company and ask for a refund because you speculated wrong. </p><p></p><p>As for refunds, Baldman Games is a small company. Organization might be a better term. It's not like they sell products or have a ready supply of cash. I doubt it's even the full-time job of all of its members. If just half of the all-access pass people demanded a refund and were provided with one that'd be something like $15,000. That's bankruptcy territory right there. Heck, even the $7,500 of 25% of people demanding a refund would likely cripple Baldman Games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 7678265, member: 37579"] I meant the people who got the All-access pass was a small percentage of the fanbase, not that a small percentage were upset or would ask for a refund. There are millions of gamers in the world. Only 8000+ people played D&D at GenCon. A few hundred got the All-Access pass. Of the total percentage of gamers, the people who paid the all-access price are a small, small minority of the overall population of gamers. Less than 0.01%. The point was that the companies *could* have completely ignore those fan's complaints pretty easily, and still managed to sell all their all-access tickets next year. The point was that Baldman games, let alone WotC, didn't [I]have[/I] to do anything in response to the outrage. Their reaction could [I]easily[/I] have been "oh well, you paid the price, [I]caveat emptor[/I] bitches." Especially WotC who had little involvement in the process. It's not like the value : cost ratio was some hidden thing. They [I]knew[/I] the price when buying the ticket. It was right there. The people saw what was offered and made the choice the purchase anyway. Just like people did last year. They had to decide whether the bonus of a dedicated DM and firm table of players and maybe some small perk was worth the cost. And each of them decided to pay the extra price. For me, this is less idle speculation. I went to GenCon last year. I looked at getting the All-Access price. And I decided that, for me, the cost was not worth it. Even thought I would have loved that early [I]Monster Manual[/I]. The uncertainty and cost was too much, so I made the decision. Other people were willing and I don't fault them their bonus book. We all make our own decisions and choices. Sure, after last year, people might have been expecting a free copy of a book or two. But that's not guaranteed. It didn't say that on the ticket. You can't blame the company and ask for a refund because you speculated wrong. As for refunds, Baldman Games is a small company. Organization might be a better term. It's not like they sell products or have a ready supply of cash. I doubt it's even the full-time job of all of its members. If just half of the all-access pass people demanded a refund and were provided with one that'd be something like $15,000. That's bankruptcy territory right there. Heck, even the $7,500 of 25% of people demanding a refund would likely cripple Baldman Games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Baldman Games & WotC On All Access Issues At Gen Con
Top