Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lamoni" data-source="post: 1656417" data-attributes="member: 12680">That makes sense.  I just interpreted the 'effective enhancement' to not really be the true enhancement.  The true enhancement on the arrow is still a +1, which becomes a +2 when fired from the bow.  Only effectively it is 2 higher when targeting the bane opponent.  That is how I did interpret it.  Now I might like your interpretation better.  I just like to keep things as simple as possible.  I am still not completely convinced that by the rules it is definately one way vs. the other though.  Unfortunately, there are always so many angles to look at things from that often give different interpretations and different results.  Good thing there is always a DM there that can rule based on what is best for the campaign.Edit:  I just don't know whether it is simpler to say that every arrow is a +2 bane(human) arrow, or make it simpler by not trying to interpret what they might have meant by distinguishing effective enhancement from base enhancement, and say it is all just an enhancement bonus and non-stackable.The 'every arrow is a +2 bane(human) arrow' is simple in that you just add 2 vs humans without concerning yourself with where the +2 came from.The 'arrows are +2 arrows (ignore the bane) OR +1 bane(human) (add the +2 from bane) is only slightly less simple, but the reasoning behind it is quite simple after your posts.</blockquote>