Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Banking" retraining - Rules clarification needed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AngryJack" data-source="post: 5462127" data-attributes="member: 6670201"><p>Our campaign's situation is as follows: The characters have been slowly leveling from level 1. They are currently level 5, on the cusp of hitting level 6. None of the players are new to their classes. My rules junkies have come down on differing sides on how to interpret the RAW. Those who aren't mechanics oriented are the ones who don't really care what my final call is on this.</p><p></p><p>I guess what I'm asking isn't whether it's cool for me allow their interpretation or not but rather what is the commonly accepted understanding how how retraining works on this issue? I'm no stranger to rule zero and the concept of the DM as the final arbiter. My concern is about the possibility of dismissing a potentially valid argument because I already have a set opinion.</p><p></p><p>The players I'm in disagreement with usually have a good grasp on rules yet I can't understand how they're coming to this interpretation besides overly relying on the character builder tool. I've tried to find rules entries or GM's comments that might back up their reading of the rules but had no luck. No one seems to even discuss this as a debated point of rules interpretation and up until the rules debate at the gaming table tonight, it seemed pretty clear cut to me. I know I can be stubborn at times and so can my guys, so I want to get outside opinions to step outside the little microcosm of how my group interprets the rules.</p><p></p><p>In short, I'm looking to learn more about the accepted baseline in how other knowledgeable players interpret this portion of the rules to see if either viewpoint is generally prevailing.</p><p></p><p>Whether I choose to allow their take on it or use my own is a separate question, but hopefully I can make a better informed ruling based upon helpful responses. I'm not a hardline "RAW or else" type DM by any means but I like have a solid grasp of what RAW is so I can use it as an agreed upon starting point before applying my house rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AngryJack, post: 5462127, member: 6670201"] Our campaign's situation is as follows: The characters have been slowly leveling from level 1. They are currently level 5, on the cusp of hitting level 6. None of the players are new to their classes. My rules junkies have come down on differing sides on how to interpret the RAW. Those who aren't mechanics oriented are the ones who don't really care what my final call is on this. I guess what I'm asking isn't whether it's cool for me allow their interpretation or not but rather what is the commonly accepted understanding how how retraining works on this issue? I'm no stranger to rule zero and the concept of the DM as the final arbiter. My concern is about the possibility of dismissing a potentially valid argument because I already have a set opinion. The players I'm in disagreement with usually have a good grasp on rules yet I can't understand how they're coming to this interpretation besides overly relying on the character builder tool. I've tried to find rules entries or GM's comments that might back up their reading of the rules but had no luck. No one seems to even discuss this as a debated point of rules interpretation and up until the rules debate at the gaming table tonight, it seemed pretty clear cut to me. I know I can be stubborn at times and so can my guys, so I want to get outside opinions to step outside the little microcosm of how my group interprets the rules. In short, I'm looking to learn more about the accepted baseline in how other knowledgeable players interpret this portion of the rules to see if either viewpoint is generally prevailing. Whether I choose to allow their take on it or use my own is a separate question, but hopefully I can make a better informed ruling based upon helpful responses. I'm not a hardline "RAW or else" type DM by any means but I like have a solid grasp of what RAW is so I can use it as an agreed upon starting point before applying my house rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
"Banking" retraining - Rules clarification needed
Top