Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bannerets: The Tactical Geniuses with Int 8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DammitVictor" data-source="post: 9801798" data-attributes="member: 6750908"><p>Traditional fantasy narratives don't mesh with the fantasy TTRPG conceit of "dump stats", particularly the idea that not only must every character have different heroic abilities, but "balanced" heroes have to have specific notable deficiencies compared to average non-heroic individuals.</p><p></p><p>An 8 INT isn't a debilitating cognitive impairment; it's a speed bump to a character with proficiency + expertise (or Skill Focus) in a couple of INT skills, or a PF1 or 5E Bard with their respective class features.</p><p></p><p>But Captain America obviously doesn't have an 8 INT. He doesn't have the depth or breadth of scientific education as Tony or Reed... but he beats them at checkers. And chess. He beats Thor in hnefltafl and Nine Men's Morris. He <em>pisses Beast off </em>if they discuss Shakespeare or Dante or Cervantes during hand-to-hand training; he <em>does it on purpose</em> because his layered metaphors about romantic warfare help Hank remember not to drop his elbows. He's both a traditional and a syncretic martial artist, military philosopher, and elder statesman who's both fluent and literate in half a dozen languages.</p><p></p><p>Conan "the Barbarian"... let's not discuss him in class terms. He has linguistics as a superpower; he speaks more languages than <strong><em>this forum</em></strong>, literally more than every single registered member put together. He spends more time in the Aquilonian Royal Library than the kings who built it; he tolerates a conspiracy against his throne because he enjoys their revolutionary poetry. </p><p></p><p>Richard B. Riddick is pretty archetypal as a (spellless) Gloomstalker Ranger and Rogue of some kind. (PF1 Slayer for sure.) He's a connoisseur of murder cutlery, makes his own masterwork knives out of field-expedient resources, and is a skilled micropolitical operator. He can work out the sensory abilities-- and weaknesses-- of an unknown xenomorph species by examining a single skull.</p><p></p><p>In D&D, all three of them would have INT as a dump stat; if they could afford WIS and CHA at all, with their maxed out STR/DEX/CON, they'd take precedence over INT. (Unless in 3.PF where they need INT for skill points.) Leaving aside their multifaceted class features, these iconic fantasy warriors simply aren't modeled by standard ability score models. There's no reason and no way for their D&D versions to have thise traits, especially when INT and WIS and CHA skills are part of the "protected niche" of their spellcasting counterparts, whose leadership abilities aren't supposed to be their "dump stat" (compared to martials) since 3.0.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DammitVictor, post: 9801798, member: 6750908"] Traditional fantasy narratives don't mesh with the fantasy TTRPG conceit of "dump stats", particularly the idea that not only must every character have different heroic abilities, but "balanced" heroes have to have specific notable deficiencies compared to average non-heroic individuals. An 8 INT isn't a debilitating cognitive impairment; it's a speed bump to a character with proficiency + expertise (or Skill Focus) in a couple of INT skills, or a PF1 or 5E Bard with their respective class features. But Captain America obviously doesn't have an 8 INT. He doesn't have the depth or breadth of scientific education as Tony or Reed... but he beats them at checkers. And chess. He beats Thor in hnefltafl and Nine Men's Morris. He [I]pisses Beast off [/I]if they discuss Shakespeare or Dante or Cervantes during hand-to-hand training; he [I]does it on purpose[/I] because his layered metaphors about romantic warfare help Hank remember not to drop his elbows. He's both a traditional and a syncretic martial artist, military philosopher, and elder statesman who's both fluent and literate in half a dozen languages. Conan "the Barbarian"... let's not discuss him in class terms. He has linguistics as a superpower; he speaks more languages than [B][I]this forum[/I][/B], literally more than every single registered member put together. He spends more time in the Aquilonian Royal Library than the kings who built it; he tolerates a conspiracy against his throne because he enjoys their revolutionary poetry. Richard B. Riddick is pretty archetypal as a (spellless) Gloomstalker Ranger and Rogue of some kind. (PF1 Slayer for sure.) He's a connoisseur of murder cutlery, makes his own masterwork knives out of field-expedient resources, and is a skilled micropolitical operator. He can work out the sensory abilities-- and weaknesses-- of an unknown xenomorph species by examining a single skull. In D&D, all three of them would have INT as a dump stat; if they could afford WIS and CHA at all, with their maxed out STR/DEX/CON, they'd take precedence over INT. (Unless in 3.PF where they need INT for skill points.) Leaving aside their multifaceted class features, these iconic fantasy warriors simply aren't modeled by standard ability score models. There's no reason and no way for their D&D versions to have thise traits, especially when INT and WIS and CHA skills are part of the "protected niche" of their spellcasting counterparts, whose leadership abilities aren't supposed to be their "dump stat" (compared to martials) since 3.0. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bannerets: The Tactical Geniuses with Int 8
Top