Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Barbarian as a Background/Theme
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tuxgeo" data-source="post: 5926030" data-attributes="member: 61026"><p>I hope the Barbarian comes out as an optional class so it can have alignment restrictions similar to (and reminiscent of) "any non-Greek." </p><p></p><p>IRL, the Persians had cities, but the Greeks called the Persians "barbarians" anyway. Barbarism isn't about settlement density or stability, it's about culture and the perceived lack of philosophical sophistication. Many so-called barbarians rarely if ever entered the wilderness -- they stayed on their farms and in their shops.</p><p></p><p>I like your first example of a background, though; but if the 5E Barbarian does become a class, then there probably won't be any use for a Barbarian background or theme. </p><p></p><p>Along much the same lines, but not for the purposes of replacing any prior class, how about this potential background: </p><p></p><p><strong>Hunter:</strong> </p><p>You spent part of your earlier life near lands where you could hunt, and people there taught you their hunting ways. You retain your proficiency at venery, and can still bring home your vanquished prey with some regularity. You have training in the skills listed below, and you gain the indicated bonus on any check involving that skill.</p><p></p><p>Animal Handling +3</p><p>Jump +3</p><p>Natural Lore +3</p><p>Survival +3 </p><p></p><p>You also gain the background feature called hunter's weapon. </p><p><strong>Hunter's Weapon:</strong> </p><p>Choose a weapon appropriate for hunting in the area where you spent a significant number of your early years. You gain proficiency with that weapon. (Examples might include bows for deer-stalkers, pack-hounds for fox-hunters (as in "Riding to the Hounds"), spears for boar-hunters (as in "Pig-Sticking"); and, for bird-hunters, such things as falconry, boomerangs, slings with birdshot, or bows with forked arrows.) </p><p></p><p>(Yes, I know that pack-hounds and falconry aren't in the Equipment List. These are just examples off the top of my head.)</p><p></p><p>Edit: I just noticed that the initial playtest packet would marginalize the above list of skills -- because there are no <em>explicit</em> conditions under which a Jump check would ordinarily be called for. </p><p></p><p>Re-edit the next day: So, if a PC with STR 12 and this background declared an intention to pursue his stag by jumping across a creek that is 15 feet wide (comparable to the Moonwash stream in lowtown Fallcrest), then the DM would be able to say, "Hm. You normally can only jump 12 feet, and this is 15. You might get your feet wet. Give me a Strength check." At that point, the +3 to Jump does come into play, and the players rolls 1d20 + 4, which would give a result range from 5 to 24. This could still fail against a Trivial DC of 10, so the player still has to roll well to succeed. Against a Moderate DC of 14, the player would succeed on a 10, so that's 55% chance of success if that were the DC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tuxgeo, post: 5926030, member: 61026"] I hope the Barbarian comes out as an optional class so it can have alignment restrictions similar to (and reminiscent of) "any non-Greek." IRL, the Persians had cities, but the Greeks called the Persians "barbarians" anyway. Barbarism isn't about settlement density or stability, it's about culture and the perceived lack of philosophical sophistication. Many so-called barbarians rarely if ever entered the wilderness -- they stayed on their farms and in their shops. I like your first example of a background, though; but if the 5E Barbarian does become a class, then there probably won't be any use for a Barbarian background or theme. Along much the same lines, but not for the purposes of replacing any prior class, how about this potential background: [B]Hunter:[/B] You spent part of your earlier life near lands where you could hunt, and people there taught you their hunting ways. You retain your proficiency at venery, and can still bring home your vanquished prey with some regularity. You have training in the skills listed below, and you gain the indicated bonus on any check involving that skill. Animal Handling +3 Jump +3 Natural Lore +3 Survival +3 You also gain the background feature called hunter's weapon. [B]Hunter's Weapon:[/B] Choose a weapon appropriate for hunting in the area where you spent a significant number of your early years. You gain proficiency with that weapon. (Examples might include bows for deer-stalkers, pack-hounds for fox-hunters (as in "Riding to the Hounds"), spears for boar-hunters (as in "Pig-Sticking"); and, for bird-hunters, such things as falconry, boomerangs, slings with birdshot, or bows with forked arrows.) (Yes, I know that pack-hounds and falconry aren't in the Equipment List. These are just examples off the top of my head.) Edit: I just noticed that the initial playtest packet would marginalize the above list of skills -- because there are no [I]explicit[/I] conditions under which a Jump check would ordinarily be called for. Re-edit the next day: So, if a PC with STR 12 and this background declared an intention to pursue his stag by jumping across a creek that is 15 feet wide (comparable to the Moonwash stream in lowtown Fallcrest), then the DM would be able to say, "Hm. You normally can only jump 12 feet, and this is 15. You might get your feet wet. Give me a Strength check." At that point, the +3 to Jump does come into play, and the players rolls 1d20 + 4, which would give a result range from 5 to 24. This could still fail against a Trivial DC of 10, so the player still has to roll well to succeed. Against a Moderate DC of 14, the player would succeed on a 10, so that's 55% chance of success if that were the DC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Barbarian as a Background/Theme
Top