Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kaledor" data-source="post: 5404694" data-attributes="member: 15360">Yeah, that must be where the NOs were getting there info...I just pointed this thread out to one of my players (standing over my shoulder... I can't say anyhting bad about her <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :P"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /> ) She's one of my rules lawyers (more like rules &quot;law-student&quot; &lt;-- hope she doesn't see that).&nbsp; She tells me that the Charge is not an actual &quot;Attack Action&quot; and is specifically listed separately from the Attack Action in the &quot;Standard Action&quot; entry (just like Second Wind is listed separately from Attack Action and Charge Action in the Standard Action entry). hmmm... makes things a bit more interesting now.I would think that since the Charge ENDS in an attack (in this case the Howling Strike) that Charge Action would be considered an attack and thus not allowed in the &quot;no multiple free attack actions&quot; line. And 'heck, if you're attacking someone, it's an attack action (seems pretty clear to me) But then why include it as something different from an Attack Action.(Personally, I'm inclined to believe the NOs here... but I include the other side of the arguement for discussion's sake... and b/c she's telling me to lol)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kaledor, post: 5404694, member: 15360"] Yeah, that must be where the NOs were getting there info... I just pointed this thread out to one of my players (standing over my shoulder... I can't say anyhting bad about her :P ) She's one of my rules lawyers (more like rules "law-student" <-- hope she doesn't see that). She tells me that the Charge is not an actual "Attack Action" and is specifically listed separately from the Attack Action in the "Standard Action" entry (just like Second Wind is listed separately from Attack Action and Charge Action in the Standard Action entry). hmmm... makes things a bit more interesting now. I would think that since the Charge ENDS in an attack (in this case the Howling Strike) that Charge Action would be considered an attack and thus not allowed in the "no multiple free attack actions" line. And 'heck, if you're attacking someone, it's an attack action (seems pretty clear to me) But then why include it as something different from an Attack Action. (Personally, I'm inclined to believe the NOs here... but I include the other side of the arguement for discussion's sake... and b/c [B]she's [/B]telling me to lol) [/QUOTE]

Verification