Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ProfessorCirno" data-source="post: 4497269" data-attributes="member: 65637">Man, I forgot how goofy the 4e armor names were ;pThoughts on Barbarians, mostly parroting what others have said:- With this and the spellsword class, I think we're seeing a definite power creep, and it's one that's already starting very early on.- Lots of stuff here is poorly written, and I think there's one in particular we're ALL talking about.  Even if you personally don't see a problem with it, it's pretty obvious that a lot of people do.- One of the things we heard in 4e development was that races would be different but equal; an elf fighter and dwarf fighter would play very differently, but one wouldn't be inherently better then the other.  I think this was mostly geared towards making the classes very MAD, which, in their defense, they were - at the least, classes would need have three main attributes, which would give a good racial diversity.  I think barbarians break that though; they really don't need a lot of stats, at least from what we've seen so far, and as such there IS the problem of one master race for barbarians.- Barbarians, due to chainmail, start off inherently with one less feat <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>