Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bard and Loremaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xanterith" data-source="post: 3171239" data-attributes="member: 47264"><p>Thanks guys, we'll see what happens. </p><p></p><p>Hard to say which would be more powerful - stacking or 2 rolls. Based on my feats and ability scores, I now have a +16 to my bardic knowledge (at 4th level) and a +15 to my loremaster knowledge (at 3rd level). </p><p></p><p>At the current level, my odds of success with two rolls at a target number of 30 is: 47.5% If the two classes stacked, my chance for success at a 30 would be: 45%</p><p></p><p>I plan to raise my int twice more, and get an additional enhance bonus of +4 - so that's another +3 to the bonus of each. Then I have another 7 levels of loremaster, so the final totals at 20th level without tomes or wished ability scores would be +19 for bardic and +25 for Loremaster. So on a 5 or higher or a 11 or higher I would pass the roll at it's stated max in the PHB. Works out to be roughly 87.5% probability of positive.</p><p></p><p>Now if the levels stacked, I get one roll, at a +29 (+25 for loremaster and +4 for bard levels) which results in a 95% probability of being positive. Hmmm.... </p><p></p><p>The results flip if I can find a way to get my bard AND loremaster up above +27. At +29 there is a 99.75% probability of being positive. </p><p></p><p>I ran a bunch of different level and number combinations through these calculations and found that in most cases the probability of the level stacking succeeding was higher than the two rolls, until the single roll reached it's maximum probability of success at 95% (failure on a 1). </p><p></p><p>Bottom line, the differences were very slight, and I think the rolls should be kept separate because a DM can say "Your bardic knowledge would not really apply here, but your loremaster would" in special situations (outer planar stuff, arcane writings, stuff from ANCIENT prehistoric tomes, etc.) and vice versa. Pop culture and myths of the common folk might not be known by a lore master. Anyway, food for thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xanterith, post: 3171239, member: 47264"] Thanks guys, we'll see what happens. Hard to say which would be more powerful - stacking or 2 rolls. Based on my feats and ability scores, I now have a +16 to my bardic knowledge (at 4th level) and a +15 to my loremaster knowledge (at 3rd level). At the current level, my odds of success with two rolls at a target number of 30 is: 47.5% If the two classes stacked, my chance for success at a 30 would be: 45% I plan to raise my int twice more, and get an additional enhance bonus of +4 - so that's another +3 to the bonus of each. Then I have another 7 levels of loremaster, so the final totals at 20th level without tomes or wished ability scores would be +19 for bardic and +25 for Loremaster. So on a 5 or higher or a 11 or higher I would pass the roll at it's stated max in the PHB. Works out to be roughly 87.5% probability of positive. Now if the levels stacked, I get one roll, at a +29 (+25 for loremaster and +4 for bard levels) which results in a 95% probability of being positive. Hmmm.... The results flip if I can find a way to get my bard AND loremaster up above +27. At +29 there is a 99.75% probability of being positive. I ran a bunch of different level and number combinations through these calculations and found that in most cases the probability of the level stacking succeeding was higher than the two rolls, until the single roll reached it's maximum probability of success at 95% (failure on a 1). Bottom line, the differences were very slight, and I think the rolls should be kept separate because a DM can say "Your bardic knowledge would not really apply here, but your loremaster would" in special situations (outer planar stuff, arcane writings, stuff from ANCIENT prehistoric tomes, etc.) and vice versa. Pop culture and myths of the common folk might not be known by a lore master. Anyway, food for thought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bard and Loremaster
Top