Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bard Playtest discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 8787639" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p>In the 1e DMs Guide, Gygax describes what he means by hit points. Heh. He is the source of all of the later conflicts about how to interpret hit points.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, there is a doublestandard.</p><p></p><p>• For player characters, hit points are almost entirely nonphysical.</p><p>• But for monsters, hit points are almost entirely physical.</p><p></p><p>This doublethink allows players to ignore the inconveniences of actual wounds. At the same time, the DM can go into gory detail about hacking up a monster for its visceral entertainment value.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unsurprisingly, there are some further inconsistencies. Despite describing the player character damage as nonphysical, the amount of time it takes to heal might imply the healing of actual wounds. When Gygax describes the Constitution bonus to hit points, his example (Rasputin) goes into graphic violence to describe the ability to survive many death-dealing physical injuries. His main point seems to be, some individuals have high Constitution, while others dont. But by extension, at least the hit points that come from Constitution seem to refer to physical trauma. That said, Constitution is also responsibility for avoiding fatigue, so that implies buffing the nonphysical hit points too.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, we happen to know what Gygax thinks about hit points, and it is complex and inconsistent, depending on which context one is describing when referring to hit points.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my view, 4e and 5e have the best systematization of the conflictive D&D traditions about hit points.</p><p></p><p>From max hit points until half hit points is strictly nonphysical, except for allowing some glancing contact if dealing poison or similar contact effect.</p><p></p><p>At half hit points, the creature becomes "bloodied". The damage is still mostly nonphysical, but there is cosmetic superficial physical damage, the kind that leaves bruises and requires bandages.</p><p></p><p>Only at zero hit points, can there actually be a deadly wound − the proverbial sword thru the gut.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 8787639, member: 58172"] In the 1e DMs Guide, Gygax describes what he means by hit points. Heh. He is the source of all of the later conflicts about how to interpret hit points. Essentially, there is a doublestandard. • For player characters, hit points are almost entirely nonphysical. • But for monsters, hit points are almost entirely physical. This doublethink allows players to ignore the inconveniences of actual wounds. At the same time, the DM can go into gory detail about hacking up a monster for its visceral entertainment value. Unsurprisingly, there are some further inconsistencies. Despite describing the player character damage as nonphysical, the amount of time it takes to heal might imply the healing of actual wounds. When Gygax describes the Constitution bonus to hit points, his example (Rasputin) goes into graphic violence to describe the ability to survive many death-dealing physical injuries. His main point seems to be, some individuals have high Constitution, while others dont. But by extension, at least the hit points that come from Constitution seem to refer to physical trauma. That said, Constitution is also responsibility for avoiding fatigue, so that implies buffing the nonphysical hit points too. Anyway, we happen to know what Gygax thinks about hit points, and it is complex and inconsistent, depending on which context one is describing when referring to hit points. In my view, 4e and 5e have the best systematization of the conflictive D&D traditions about hit points. From max hit points until half hit points is strictly nonphysical, except for allowing some glancing contact if dealing poison or similar contact effect. At half hit points, the creature becomes "bloodied". The damage is still mostly nonphysical, but there is cosmetic superficial physical damage, the kind that leaves bruises and requires bandages. Only at zero hit points, can there actually be a deadly wound − the proverbial sword thru the gut. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bard Playtest discussion
Top