Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bargaining and debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Primitive Screwhead" data-source="post: 5743933" data-attributes="member: 20805"><p>Yes, the players decide which goal to pursue {roll against} and can concede points on other goals as a means to gain on the selected one.</p><p></p><p>My intent with this system was to put choices in the hands of the players, and have those choices shape the adventure path. They told Lord Shaladel who took the Torch as part of the deal regarding the freedom of Gates Pass, so now if they try to recover the Torch they will have competition....</p><p> But Gate's pass won't become a vassal state to the Shahalestian Empire.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I didn't specify a skill because that depends on the players approach. Mechanically it is the same DC, but use of bluff or intimidate might backfire... or possibly be advantageous. PCs could use Insight to see what the best approach would be. </p><p> Technically you can use pretty much any other skill as well, as long as the roleplaying pitch supports it. Lord Shaladel is enamored with history, so a knowledge history could allow you to refer to similar times in the past that went the way you prefer... gaining successes.</p><p></p><p></p><p> In negotiations with a stereotypical barbarian, using intimidate is what he expects and he might start to dislike the PCs for 'talking sweet'. This would reflect in him pushing to close the negotiation early or possibly even shift attitude down a notch to neutral {if friendly} or hostile {if neutral}</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Primitive Screwhead, post: 5743933, member: 20805"] Yes, the players decide which goal to pursue {roll against} and can concede points on other goals as a means to gain on the selected one. My intent with this system was to put choices in the hands of the players, and have those choices shape the adventure path. They told Lord Shaladel who took the Torch as part of the deal regarding the freedom of Gates Pass, so now if they try to recover the Torch they will have competition.... But Gate's pass won't become a vassal state to the Shahalestian Empire. No, I didn't specify a skill because that depends on the players approach. Mechanically it is the same DC, but use of bluff or intimidate might backfire... or possibly be advantageous. PCs could use Insight to see what the best approach would be. Technically you can use pretty much any other skill as well, as long as the roleplaying pitch supports it. Lord Shaladel is enamored with history, so a knowledge history could allow you to refer to similar times in the past that went the way you prefer... gaining successes. In negotiations with a stereotypical barbarian, using intimidate is what he expects and he might start to dislike the PCs for 'talking sweet'. This would reflect in him pushing to close the negotiation early or possibly even shift attitude down a notch to neutral {if friendly} or hostile {if neutral} [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bargaining and debate
Top