Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6442639" data-attributes="member: 7006">The funny thing though (as I mentioned way further up) is that really, none of us have to &quot;house rule&quot; quote/unquote anything.&nbsp; The rule as presented is extremely clear and works exactly right, no necessary editing or &quot;figuring out&quot; required at all-- with two completely different results.&nbsp; Heh heh!I don't know if any of us have read the Barkskin spell and have had to ask ourselves &quot;Wait-- what?&nbsp; I don't understand.&nbsp; That doesn't make sense!&quot;&nbsp; The spell as written has (I think) made perfect sense to every one of us.&nbsp; We just end up with two entirely separate ways to play it.Which actually I think is really kinda impressive!&nbsp; They were able to write a single rule that generates two results, both of which are extremely clear to both sides and which seem so obvious none of us can understand how the other side doesn't see it the same way.&nbsp; I don't think that's easy.&nbsp; They should be commended for an absolutely BEAUTIFUL creation of something completely screwed up!&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6442639, member: 7006"] The funny thing though (as I mentioned way further up) is that really, none of us have to "house rule" quote/unquote anything. The rule as presented is extremely clear and works exactly right, no necessary editing or "figuring out" required at all-- with two completely different results. Heh heh! I don't know if any of us have read the Barkskin spell and have had to ask ourselves "Wait-- what? I don't understand. That doesn't make sense!" The spell as written has (I think) made perfect sense to every one of us. We just end up with two entirely separate ways to play it. Which actually I think is really kinda impressive! They were able to write a single rule that generates two results, both of which are extremely clear to both sides and which seem so obvious none of us can understand how the other side doesn't see it the same way. I don't think that's easy. They should be commended for an absolutely BEAUTIFUL creation of something completely screwed up! ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification