Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Basic D&D rides again!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 1253513" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>Here's the problem with the position as I see it: That's putting a LOT on that first-time DM; if the game is to grow, not only does it need introduction via existing groups, it also needs a way to introduce players by itself. It needs a self-contained introduction, because only the most dedicated person could take all three rulebooks and learn the game without any outside influence whatsoever. </p><p></p><p>Also, you have perception, which can be more powerful than reality. Gamers who like the idea of D&D, but who are put off by the confluence of rules, may be more disposed to try a D&D with the same core concepts, but fewer options, strange though that might sound. WotC may have realized a need to want to tap into a still sizeable market out there who play older editions of AD&D, and as such have no reason to buy new products. A new Basic might be used to woo players who are put off by those things which most d20 players find attractive - namely, the options. (I've learned a lot schlepping around Dragonsfoot.org. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />)</p><p></p><p>This is the very market that smaller companies are still dying to capture, and it's possible that WotC releasing this about the proposed time of Castles and Crusades is not an accident, as someone pointed out. Any small company could give their right arms to have a force of up to 30 to 50 thousand fans (as an estimate) who return to buying current D&D material by way of their game. If it's good enough, and it captures the imagination enough, a small publisher's product could grab many players who prefer a DM's adjudication to large numbers of optional rules. </p><p></p><p>(My estimate, by the way, comes from the 25,000 to 30,000 sales figures for the Hackmaster Player's handbook, and the fact that there are a lot of people I've corresponded with either bought HM because they were looking for a d20 alternative, or who didn't buy Hackmaster because it didn't capture the feel they are looking for. It's an arbitrary figure, to be sure, but one I feel is justifiable.)</p><p></p><p>So, does WotC need a Basic set? Maybe not, but their desire to grow the game outside of the traditional channel is worthwhile. The 3.5 Rulebooks are definitely not attractive for brand-new gamers without exposure to the "Gamer Network."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Henry, post: 1253513, member: 158"] Here's the problem with the position as I see it: That's putting a LOT on that first-time DM; if the game is to grow, not only does it need introduction via existing groups, it also needs a way to introduce players by itself. It needs a self-contained introduction, because only the most dedicated person could take all three rulebooks and learn the game without any outside influence whatsoever. Also, you have perception, which can be more powerful than reality. Gamers who like the idea of D&D, but who are put off by the confluence of rules, may be more disposed to try a D&D with the same core concepts, but fewer options, strange though that might sound. WotC may have realized a need to want to tap into a still sizeable market out there who play older editions of AD&D, and as such have no reason to buy new products. A new Basic might be used to woo players who are put off by those things which most d20 players find attractive - namely, the options. (I've learned a lot schlepping around Dragonsfoot.org. :)) This is the very market that smaller companies are still dying to capture, and it's possible that WotC releasing this about the proposed time of Castles and Crusades is not an accident, as someone pointed out. Any small company could give their right arms to have a force of up to 30 to 50 thousand fans (as an estimate) who return to buying current D&D material by way of their game. If it's good enough, and it captures the imagination enough, a small publisher's product could grab many players who prefer a DM's adjudication to large numbers of optional rules. (My estimate, by the way, comes from the 25,000 to 30,000 sales figures for the Hackmaster Player's handbook, and the fact that there are a lot of people I've corresponded with either bought HM because they were looking for a d20 alternative, or who didn't buy Hackmaster because it didn't capture the feel they are looking for. It's an arbitrary figure, to be sure, but one I feel is justifiable.) So, does WotC need a Basic set? Maybe not, but their desire to grow the game outside of the traditional channel is worthwhile. The 3.5 Rulebooks are definitely not attractive for brand-new gamers without exposure to the "Gamer Network." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Basic D&D rides again!
Top