Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CuRoi" data-source="post: 5463920" data-attributes="member: 98032"><p>It's not enough to not play it because you are critical of it?&nbsp; I bought all three core books on release, read them, played in several sessions and never liked it. That said, I won't criticize the mechanics of the game or pretend to know how &quot;balanced&quot; it is. I like some of the rules changes actually, some didn't sit well with me and some were just not -enough- of a change. I don't think that means someone needs to play it for a year to decide they don't care much for the way the game plays and the overall feel of the system. So I think people who have studied it and given it a shot, should feel free to express their opinions or be critical to some degree. Of course I'll try to refrain as that's not what this thread is about. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing&nbsp; &nbsp; :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="CuRoi, post: 5463920, member: 98032"] It's not enough to not play it because you are critical of it? I bought all three core books on release, read them, played in several sessions and never liked it. That said, I won't criticize the mechanics of the game or pretend to know how "balanced" it is. I like some of the rules changes actually, some didn't sit well with me and some were just not -enough- of a change. I don't think that means someone needs to play it for a year to decide they don't care much for the way the game plays and the overall feel of the system. So I think people who have studied it and given it a shot, should feel free to express their opinions or be critical to some degree. Of course I'll try to refrain as that's not what this thread is about. :lol: [/QUOTE]

Verification