Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mort" data-source="post: 5463971" data-attributes="member: 762">While certainly true, the mage will likely still be quite effective. The fighter, on the other hand, will be difficult to play by an experienced player and and almost impossible for a newbie! But it's still a major flaw in the system, the fact that an experienced group may avoid the trap does not change that.That's making my point! a newbie can make an effective wizard, a good experienced player can easily take over the table by playing a wizard well. Pathfinder has taken huge steps, but the fact that it has taken huge steps and at high levels wizards can still easily dominate should say something.Because a fighter, of any level, has so many less options! of course they are easier to play at the table.Perhaps. WoTC certainly chose a side, anytime you do that your not going to please everybody , they could have been less extreme but, for better or worse, that clearly was not their goal.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mort, post: 5463971, member: 762"] While certainly true, the mage will likely still be quite effective. The fighter, on the other hand, will be difficult to play by an experienced player and and almost impossible for a newbie! But it's still a major flaw in the system, the fact that an experienced group may avoid the trap does not change that. That's making my point! a newbie can make an effective wizard, a good experienced player can easily take over the table by playing a wizard well. Pathfinder has taken huge steps, but the fact that it has taken huge steps and at high levels wizards can still easily dominate should say something. Because a fighter, of any level, has so many less options! of course they are easier to play at the table. Perhaps. WoTC certainly chose a side, anytime you do that your not going to please everybody , they could have been less extreme but, for better or worse, that clearly was not their goal. [/QUOTE]

Verification