Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Batch Buffing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GuardianLurker" data-source="post: 85564" data-attributes="member: 786"><p>Again, it's the spell slots, not the time. Quicken spell doesn't really solve this, and in some sense even agravates it, by raising the level of at least one spell in the combo by 4.</p><p></p><p>I repeat, it's the spell slots, not the time. Heck, let's make all the batch spells have a casting time of "One round", or "Two rounds".</p><p></p><p></p><p>On the other hand, <em>Rary's Mnemonic Enhancer</em> restores three levels of spells - any three that you have prepared that day. Which would argue that a spell that only restores 2 levels would be a third level spell. And the <em>Twin Spell</em> and <em>Repeat Spell</em> feats are both +2 levels (if I remember correctly).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Bingo. Speaking from a point of self-interest, <em>Mass Haste</em> (or its lesser cousin) don't help my wizard live through the battle, or even the first round; the party can wait a round while I cover my wimpy wizard butt. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /> Besides, I'm more than willing to brew those potions of Haste for the other guys.</p><p></p><p>Thinking about it, given the Rary's issue I mentioned above, I think the spells should be revised to :</p><p></p><p>Protected Mage would unhappily seem to work out to a 9th level spell if we follow a strict n-1 limit, but that seems awfully high. Especially since the two feats would essentially allow you to double cast a 7th level spell (for a total of 2n-4 levels). And Polibrun's logarithmic scale seems overpowered - a 9th level spell is not going to let you cast MM 128 times. As an interim, suppose we take 2n-5 as the general number of spell levels a Nth level spell will restore in a Rary's type spell.</p><p></p><p>Then we have</p><p>Level 2 = -1 (not possible)</p><p>Level 3 = 1 (possible but why bother?)</p><p>Level 4 = 3 (That's Rary's)</p><p>Level 5 = 5</p><p>Level 6 = 7</p><p>Level 7 = 9</p><p>Level 8 = 11</p><p>Level 9 = 13</p><p></p><p>This would put Protected Mage at 6th, with 8 total spell levels, and Improved Protected Mage (with 13) at 9th, if I was to use a Rary's type spell. Since I don't need the flexibility of a Rary's, and I'm willing to do this as a full-round cast, I think I can probably get away with droping Protected Mage to 5th and Improved Protected Mage to 8th. </p><p></p><p>Actually, I just realized that it's silly to have both <em>blink</em> and <em>improved invisibility</em>, so if we drop the blink, we drop to 10 total levels (a solid 7th), and the power reductions would take us to 6th.</p><p></p><p>How's that sound?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GuardianLurker, post: 85564, member: 786"] Again, it's the spell slots, not the time. Quicken spell doesn't really solve this, and in some sense even agravates it, by raising the level of at least one spell in the combo by 4. I repeat, it's the spell slots, not the time. Heck, let's make all the batch spells have a casting time of "One round", or "Two rounds". On the other hand, [i]Rary's Mnemonic Enhancer[/i] restores three levels of spells - any three that you have prepared that day. Which would argue that a spell that only restores 2 levels would be a third level spell. And the [i]Twin Spell[/i] and [i]Repeat Spell[/i] feats are both +2 levels (if I remember correctly). Bingo. Speaking from a point of self-interest, [i]Mass Haste[/i] (or its lesser cousin) don't help my wizard live through the battle, or even the first round; the party can wait a round while I cover my wimpy wizard butt. :P Besides, I'm more than willing to brew those potions of Haste for the other guys. Thinking about it, given the Rary's issue I mentioned above, I think the spells should be revised to : Protected Mage would unhappily seem to work out to a 9th level spell if we follow a strict n-1 limit, but that seems awfully high. Especially since the two feats would essentially allow you to double cast a 7th level spell (for a total of 2n-4 levels). And Polibrun's logarithmic scale seems overpowered - a 9th level spell is not going to let you cast MM 128 times. As an interim, suppose we take 2n-5 as the general number of spell levels a Nth level spell will restore in a Rary's type spell. Then we have Level 2 = -1 (not possible) Level 3 = 1 (possible but why bother?) Level 4 = 3 (That's Rary's) Level 5 = 5 Level 6 = 7 Level 7 = 9 Level 8 = 11 Level 9 = 13 This would put Protected Mage at 6th, with 8 total spell levels, and Improved Protected Mage (with 13) at 9th, if I was to use a Rary's type spell. Since I don't need the flexibility of a Rary's, and I'm willing to do this as a full-round cast, I think I can probably get away with droping Protected Mage to 5th and Improved Protected Mage to 8th. Actually, I just realized that it's silly to have both [i]blink[/i] and [i]improved invisibility[/i], so if we drop the blink, we drop to 10 total levels (a solid 7th), and the power reductions would take us to 6th. How's that sound? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Batch Buffing
Top