Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Battledancer [Fighter variant]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arkhandus" data-source="post: 2984856" data-attributes="member: 13966"><p>Too weak at low levels, a bit too strong at high levels, probably average or nearly so at middle levels.</p><p></p><p>At 1st-level, they give up 2 HP along with most armor and shield proficiencies, in exchange for Sneak Attack +1d6. Lame. They'll probably be 1-6 points behind on AC (depending on what Fighter you compare with; since the Battledancer won't use shields, best compare with a greatsword-wielding Fighter, in which case the AC difference will be 1-2 points initially). Their damage output will marginally increase at low levels, if at all, while their defense will suffer at least a bit for certain.</p><p></p><p>The Battledancer will probably put their 1st or 2nd best score into Dexterity to mitigate the AC loss due to lighter armor, but Strength will probably still be priority 1 anyway. Constitution priority 2 or 3, Intelligence priority 3 or 4 just to get Improved Trip and maybe, just maybe, Improved Feint, not that a Battledancer will ever both feinting to get in SA's when he could just full-attack for similar results, or flank and full-attack to get in SA's.</p><p></p><p>Prepare for mid-to-upper-level Battledancers going greatsword + WF/GWF/WS/GWS + flanking + power attack + 4 sneak attacks, each round, every round. Well, except for the first round they attack. On that round, one tumbles up to a foe, readies, another tumbles up on the other side, and then both sneak attack. With flanking, and the first attack being a trip attempt using Improved Trip, they'll eviscerate each opponent as an unstoppable deadly duo.</p><p></p><p>Then, when they occasionally face undead, constructs, elementals, or the like, they'll just have to fall back on using regular Fighter tactics without the aid of Sneak Attack, but they'll still be doing pretty well.</p><p></p><p>Their only drawback will be the combination of having slightly fewer HP (as if they won't already have a decent Constitution) along with a slightly lower AC (which of course, only serves at mid-to-upper levels to slightly reduce the amount of Power Attack adjustment the enemies use). Against many foes, none of the Battledancer's drawbacks will really come into play. They'll Sneak Attack most everything to death in seconds.</p><p></p><p>I'd lower the rate of Sneak Attack advancement, give them Shield Proficiency, and give them something like 2 or 4 bonus skill points at 1st-level specifically to be spent on Balance, Bluff, Jump, and/or Tumble. At least that's the simplest solution I can come up with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arkhandus, post: 2984856, member: 13966"] Too weak at low levels, a bit too strong at high levels, probably average or nearly so at middle levels. At 1st-level, they give up 2 HP along with most armor and shield proficiencies, in exchange for Sneak Attack +1d6. Lame. They'll probably be 1-6 points behind on AC (depending on what Fighter you compare with; since the Battledancer won't use shields, best compare with a greatsword-wielding Fighter, in which case the AC difference will be 1-2 points initially). Their damage output will marginally increase at low levels, if at all, while their defense will suffer at least a bit for certain. The Battledancer will probably put their 1st or 2nd best score into Dexterity to mitigate the AC loss due to lighter armor, but Strength will probably still be priority 1 anyway. Constitution priority 2 or 3, Intelligence priority 3 or 4 just to get Improved Trip and maybe, just maybe, Improved Feint, not that a Battledancer will ever both feinting to get in SA's when he could just full-attack for similar results, or flank and full-attack to get in SA's. Prepare for mid-to-upper-level Battledancers going greatsword + WF/GWF/WS/GWS + flanking + power attack + 4 sneak attacks, each round, every round. Well, except for the first round they attack. On that round, one tumbles up to a foe, readies, another tumbles up on the other side, and then both sneak attack. With flanking, and the first attack being a trip attempt using Improved Trip, they'll eviscerate each opponent as an unstoppable deadly duo. Then, when they occasionally face undead, constructs, elementals, or the like, they'll just have to fall back on using regular Fighter tactics without the aid of Sneak Attack, but they'll still be doing pretty well. Their only drawback will be the combination of having slightly fewer HP (as if they won't already have a decent Constitution) along with a slightly lower AC (which of course, only serves at mid-to-upper levels to slightly reduce the amount of Power Attack adjustment the enemies use). Against many foes, none of the Battledancer's drawbacks will really come into play. They'll Sneak Attack most everything to death in seconds. I'd lower the rate of Sneak Attack advancement, give them Shield Proficiency, and give them something like 2 or 4 bonus skill points at 1st-level specifically to be spent on Balance, Bluff, Jump, and/or Tumble. At least that's the simplest solution I can come up with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Battledancer [Fighter variant]
Top