Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
battlemat: square grid vs. hex grid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="atom crash" data-source="post: 1766586" data-attributes="member: 22162"><p>I have the large double-sided battlemat with a square grid on one side and a hex grid on the other side. It seems like the core rules assume you use a square grid rather than a hex grid (and all the examples are shown n a hex grid). One thing I dislike about the 3.5 spell templates is that the square grid does a horrible job of handling a circular (or spherical) spell area of effect. This becomes critical in my game because the sorceror just acquired a wand of fireballs.</p><p></p><p>The way I've been handling it in the past, figures in the squares that are partially enveloped by a circular spell effect get a +2 to +4 circumstance bonus to Reflex saves against those spell effects. But now I'm thinking that the hex grid would better handle these circular spell areas.</p><p></p><p>Does anyone else use the hex grid rather than the square grid and how does this affect other aspects of the game? This approach might complicate rays and cones of effect, for example, but then again the square grid doesn't handle them perfectly either.</p><p></p><p>I used the hex grid in the last session (for some outdoor encounters) and it seemed to work well enough. Perhaps I'll use the hex grid for outside encounters and the square grid for inside encounters, since the hexes seem to better allow for movement in all directions while the squares seem to direct movement in a more linear fashion.</p><p></p><p>Here are the other differences I can foresee:</p><p></p><p>1. Counting movement might be a bit tricky. Gone is the "free" diagonal. Every hex counts as five feet of movement.</p><p>2. Flanking: each hex on the grid is surrounded by six other hexes, so a maximum of only six medium-sized creatures can dogpile another medium creature, as opposed to eight on a square grid.</p><p></p><p>What else am I missing? Anyone have experience with using the hex grid?</p><p></p><p>Edit: Something else just occurred to me: how would you handle the space of a Large creature on the hex grid? Would it occupy 3 hexes instead of 4 squares?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="atom crash, post: 1766586, member: 22162"] I have the large double-sided battlemat with a square grid on one side and a hex grid on the other side. It seems like the core rules assume you use a square grid rather than a hex grid (and all the examples are shown n a hex grid). One thing I dislike about the 3.5 spell templates is that the square grid does a horrible job of handling a circular (or spherical) spell area of effect. This becomes critical in my game because the sorceror just acquired a wand of fireballs. The way I've been handling it in the past, figures in the squares that are partially enveloped by a circular spell effect get a +2 to +4 circumstance bonus to Reflex saves against those spell effects. But now I'm thinking that the hex grid would better handle these circular spell areas. Does anyone else use the hex grid rather than the square grid and how does this affect other aspects of the game? This approach might complicate rays and cones of effect, for example, but then again the square grid doesn't handle them perfectly either. I used the hex grid in the last session (for some outdoor encounters) and it seemed to work well enough. Perhaps I'll use the hex grid for outside encounters and the square grid for inside encounters, since the hexes seem to better allow for movement in all directions while the squares seem to direct movement in a more linear fashion. Here are the other differences I can foresee: 1. Counting movement might be a bit tricky. Gone is the "free" diagonal. Every hex counts as five feet of movement. 2. Flanking: each hex on the grid is surrounded by six other hexes, so a maximum of only six medium-sized creatures can dogpile another medium creature, as opposed to eight on a square grid. What else am I missing? Anyone have experience with using the hex grid? Edit: Something else just occurred to me: how would you handle the space of a Large creature on the hex grid? Would it occupy 3 hexes instead of 4 squares? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
battlemat: square grid vs. hex grid
Top