Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 4566668" data-attributes="member: 3424">While I do agree that a battlerager benefits look good on paper, and perhaps more importantly, make the player feel good about having them, I really wonder if they are overpowered good.I think the key questions to ask are:1. Is the (non-battlerager) fighter usually out of healing surges when the party takes an extended rest? (Alternatively: does the party normally take an extended rest because the (non-battlerager) fighter is out of healing surges?)2. Does the (non-battlerager) fighter regularly drop to 0 hit points or less during fights?3. Does the party Leader usually have anything better to do with his minor action if he isn't healing the (non-battlerager) fighter?If you answered &quot;no&quot; to all of the three questions, then making the non-battlerager fighter into a battlerager fighter probably isn't overpowered in your game.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 4566668, member: 3424"] While I do agree that a battlerager benefits look good on paper, and perhaps more importantly, make the player feel good about having them, I really wonder if they are overpowered good. I think the key questions to ask are: 1. Is the (non-battlerager) fighter usually out of healing surges when the party takes an extended rest? (Alternatively: does the party normally take an extended rest because the (non-battlerager) fighter is out of healing surges?) 2. Does the (non-battlerager) fighter regularly drop to 0 hit points or less during fights? 3. Does the party Leader usually have anything better to do with his minor action if he isn't healing the (non-battlerager) fighter? If you answered "no" to all of the three questions, then making the non-battlerager fighter into a battlerager fighter probably isn't overpowered in your game. [/QUOTE]

Verification