Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Battlerager Vigor limiting it - ideas?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elric" data-source="post: 4847500" data-attributes="member: 1139"><p>Your Strikers must have terrible defenses. The Striker HP indicate that they're level 4. Boneshards have +9 vs. AC, which means that your Strikers would have 15 AC. Clearly you need better defended strikers if this is the case! </p><p></p><p>In general, a BRV fighter gives up only +1 to hit for his near invulnerability in melee (and it's not like Con-fighters are weak without BRV). Even without BRV, this fighter would still take many, many more attacks to take down than your flimsy strikers.</p><p></p><p>The often repeated idea that a defender shouldn't be "too tough" is simply wrong. If a defender was offered +3 AC for free, should he turn it down because that would make him "too hard to attack?" Not a chance. What's true is that a defender shouldn't give up too much for the sake of being tough. BRV fighters give up relatively little compared to their massive increase in toughness.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Besides Dwarven BRV fighters, the temp HP alone doesn't eliminate all or almost all monster damage past the first few levels. However, "the BRV fighter takes twice as many hits in melee to take down as a non-BRV fighter" isn't a good situation either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elric, post: 4847500, member: 1139"] Your Strikers must have terrible defenses. The Striker HP indicate that they're level 4. Boneshards have +9 vs. AC, which means that your Strikers would have 15 AC. Clearly you need better defended strikers if this is the case! In general, a BRV fighter gives up only +1 to hit for his near invulnerability in melee (and it's not like Con-fighters are weak without BRV). Even without BRV, this fighter would still take many, many more attacks to take down than your flimsy strikers. The often repeated idea that a defender shouldn't be "too tough" is simply wrong. If a defender was offered +3 AC for free, should he turn it down because that would make him "too hard to attack?" Not a chance. What's true is that a defender shouldn't give up too much for the sake of being tough. BRV fighters give up relatively little compared to their massive increase in toughness. Besides Dwarven BRV fighters, the temp HP alone doesn't eliminate all or almost all monster damage past the first few levels. However, "the BRV fighter takes twice as many hits in melee to take down as a non-BRV fighter" isn't a good situation either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Battlerager Vigor limiting it - ideas?
Top