Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sigfried" data-source="post: 8887167" data-attributes="member: 1798">Eh, it's not totally clear to me. There are sections clearly labeled as being commentary, and others that are numbered and written such that they appear to be a contract and which refer to themselves as a license agreement.An example: V. LEVELING UP UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. This agreement covers all commercial uses, whether they’re profitable or not.Another: c. it contains the text of this OGL: Non-Commercial within the body of the work.If nothing else, it is portraying itself as an agreement (aka contract aka license)  and the fact it specifically notes that certain parts are not part of the agreement strongly implies the other parts are.You may be correct, and this was just written in a way in which it is super confusing by keeping actual agreement language in an explanation of the agreement... but I think it is likely indeed a mix of the actual language with commentary intermixed in it where indicated.  I suspect the linked agreements are E-Sign or Sign and send copies and this is a document meant to paint it in the best light possible. (and failing miserably at that aim)</blockquote>