Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tequila Sunrise" data-source="post: 6320072" data-attributes="member: 40398">Same here. I wasn't very critical of game balance until I became a regular forum-goer. I remember looking at the 3.0 sorcerer and thinking "Its spells are staggered a level behind the wizard, but once it reaches 18th level it can cast spontaneous polar rays...best class evar!!!" <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />Some fans love new editions because it sets the RESET button on their over-familiarity and system analysis, but not so for me. I can't help analyzing even new rules, on some level; but I wouldn't want to 'unsee' D&D's ugly underbelly. I think it's made me a more thoughtful, tasteful person.</blockquote>