Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast Master Primal Companion Still Frustrating at level 10+
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8550762" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>Literally only in the sense of spell level progression. The Paladin and Artificer are actual half-casters. You know that spell level progression isn't the whole of the spellcasting feature, yes?</p><p></p><p>No. The spellcasting of the Ranger is less than half of the spellcasting of the Druid, Cleric, or Wizard. </p><p></p><p>You are taking the design team's intent as fact, rather than actually analyzing the system.</p><p></p><p>If you think the Ranger is as powerful as the Paladin or Artificer, there is no point to this conversation.</p><p></p><p>The Bard is powerful because it's overloaded, having nearly the skill mastery of the rogue, "full" casting, and bardic inspiration, before even getting into subclasses. Compare that to the Warlock and Sorcerer. Both lag behind <em>every single prepared fullcaster. </em></p><p></p><p>There are 3 half casters in 5e; Ranger, Paladin, and Artificer. Of them, only the Ranger is a known spells caster. You are factually incorrect about how the classes work, and yet you lecture me about "blindspots". </p><p></p><p>Now, can we either return to the actual point of the thread, or stop interacting? I do not care about CharOp discussions, and it is a distraction from the actual thread topic. </p><p></p><p>If a reminder is needed, the discussion is about the ranger being frustrating to play. An issue that <em>many</em> people experience. We know that, because the design team has repeatedly talked about and tried to address it. </p><p></p><p>The only context in which this tangential argument about casting levels is relevant to the topic is in discussing the appropriateness of known vs prepared casting as the model of casting for Rangers, and how having known spells contributes to the frustrating sense of having a small toolkit and constantly having to make more strained choices with greater opportunity cost than you would as a paladin or artificer. Particularly in the case of the Paladin, this seems backward.</p><p></p><p>Of all the classes of DnD, the Ranger should have the broadest and most versatile toolkit. Instead, it is the most constrained non-full caster.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 8550762, member: 6704184"] Literally only in the sense of spell level progression. The Paladin and Artificer are actual half-casters. You know that spell level progression isn't the whole of the spellcasting feature, yes? No. The spellcasting of the Ranger is less than half of the spellcasting of the Druid, Cleric, or Wizard. You are taking the design team's intent as fact, rather than actually analyzing the system. If you think the Ranger is as powerful as the Paladin or Artificer, there is no point to this conversation. The Bard is powerful because it's overloaded, having nearly the skill mastery of the rogue, "full" casting, and bardic inspiration, before even getting into subclasses. Compare that to the Warlock and Sorcerer. Both lag behind [I]every single prepared fullcaster. [/I] There are 3 half casters in 5e; Ranger, Paladin, and Artificer. Of them, only the Ranger is a known spells caster. You are factually incorrect about how the classes work, and yet you lecture me about "blindspots". Now, can we either return to the actual point of the thread, or stop interacting? I do not care about CharOp discussions, and it is a distraction from the actual thread topic. If a reminder is needed, the discussion is about the ranger being frustrating to play. An issue that [I]many[/I] people experience. We know that, because the design team has repeatedly talked about and tried to address it. The only context in which this tangential argument about casting levels is relevant to the topic is in discussing the appropriateness of known vs prepared casting as the model of casting for Rangers, and how having known spells contributes to the frustrating sense of having a small toolkit and constantly having to make more strained choices with greater opportunity cost than you would as a paladin or artificer. Particularly in the case of the Paladin, this seems backward. Of all the classes of DnD, the Ranger should have the broadest and most versatile toolkit. Instead, it is the most constrained non-full caster. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast Master Primal Companion Still Frustrating at level 10+
Top