Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast master wants to use pet to get +5 to passive perception
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8545996" data-attributes="member: 7032025"><p>And yet, because my interpretation takes into account the sentence (while yours does not) including the specific use of the word group (which is used all over the section in travelling, but almost nowhere else in the rules), it is valid whereas yours is not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My interpretation works way better than yours, because it is 100% in line with the stealth and surprise rules, without introducing a clunky exception of removing a character's passive perception, which appears nowhere in the rules (once more, that sentence CONFIRMS that a character has a passive perception, only that it does not apply to the groups' success), and which the lead designer has expressly told you does not appear.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where ? There has not been a single one posted out. Now, this is your last chance, show me a rule in which passive perception is not in effect, I dare you. And failing to do that will just put the nail in the coffin.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once more after totally failing on the "intention" (ignoring the podcast on stealth, then pretending that it applied only to combat), you have still failed to produce any evidence supporting what you think the intent is, whereas I have shown you direct evidence that the lead designers fully support "Passive Perception is Always On". Do you deny it ? Do you have even a shred of support for that the "intention" that you think is there in the rules ? Produce it, this is your last chance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8545996, member: 7032025"] And yet, because my interpretation takes into account the sentence (while yours does not) including the specific use of the word group (which is used all over the section in travelling, but almost nowhere else in the rules), it is valid whereas yours is not. My interpretation works way better than yours, because it is 100% in line with the stealth and surprise rules, without introducing a clunky exception of removing a character's passive perception, which appears nowhere in the rules (once more, that sentence CONFIRMS that a character has a passive perception, only that it does not apply to the groups' success), and which the lead designer has expressly told you does not appear. Where ? There has not been a single one posted out. Now, this is your last chance, show me a rule in which passive perception is not in effect, I dare you. And failing to do that will just put the nail in the coffin. Once more after totally failing on the "intention" (ignoring the podcast on stealth, then pretending that it applied only to combat), you have still failed to produce any evidence supporting what you think the intent is, whereas I have shown you direct evidence that the lead designers fully support "Passive Perception is Always On". Do you deny it ? Do you have even a shred of support for that the "intention" that you think is there in the rules ? Produce it, this is your last chance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast master wants to use pet to get +5 to passive perception
Top