Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast master wants to use pet to get +5 to passive perception
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8546011" data-attributes="member: 7032025"><p>So now that you don't find support in them, they are irrelevant ? Interesting step back...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is no such thing as automatic surprise. Sorry, if you think there is, please point the rule that says so.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep, so they apply to every single person in the group, as per any group check. Anything else ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that's exactly what I say. Where is the automatic surprise ? Still not a trace of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I thought they were irrelevant ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In any case, this is just to see if anyone in the group notices the threat. You can treat it as a group check or you can treat that as a series of individual ones, the fact is that they apply to everyone in the group. And that is just to notice the threat in advance. Before someone falls into a trap. Before entering into an ambush.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope, sorry, show me ONE RULE that tells that someone can't use it individually in any situation. Just ONE. I dare you.</p><p></p><p>The only thing that the rules say is that it still is still there (and therefore applicable to them) but that it does not count towards' the group's success. It's not that they can't use it. It's ONLY towards the group's success. Prove that it's not the case.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>100% false and absurd, since what you bolded not only shows that they HAVE a Passive Perception, and you are just forgetting half of the sentence, that does not mean auto fail. How can it say "autofail" on anything ? It's not even in the sentence !</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, sorry, the noticing threat is totally general, and has nothing to do with the type of threat. It could be a trap, for example. Nothing links it to the combat, except for a clear reference that says "when combat start, use the combat section": "If the adventurers encounter a hostile creature or group, the DM determines whether the adventurers or their foes might be <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#Surprise" target="_blank">surprised</a> when combat erupts. See <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/phb/combat" target="_blank">chapter 9</a> for more about <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/phb/combat#Surprise" target="_blank">surprise</a>." And that's it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It tells you to apply the surprise rules of chapter 9, which starts with "determining surprise by pp vs. steath check". Where does it say "autofail exactly" ?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Exactly what I said and applied. Where does it say autofail ? How does "not contributing to the group's success" translate to autofail ? By what magic ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8546011, member: 7032025"] So now that you don't find support in them, they are irrelevant ? Interesting step back... There is no such thing as automatic surprise. Sorry, if you think there is, please point the rule that says so. Yep, so they apply to every single person in the group, as per any group check. Anything else ? And that's exactly what I say. Where is the automatic surprise ? Still not a trace of it. I thought they were irrelevant ? In any case, this is just to see if anyone in the group notices the threat. You can treat it as a group check or you can treat that as a series of individual ones, the fact is that they apply to everyone in the group. And that is just to notice the threat in advance. Before someone falls into a trap. Before entering into an ambush. Nope, sorry, show me ONE RULE that tells that someone can't use it individually in any situation. Just ONE. I dare you. The only thing that the rules say is that it still is still there (and therefore applicable to them) but that it does not count towards' the group's success. It's not that they can't use it. It's ONLY towards the group's success. Prove that it's not the case. 100% false and absurd, since what you bolded not only shows that they HAVE a Passive Perception, and you are just forgetting half of the sentence, that does not mean auto fail. How can it say "autofail" on anything ? It's not even in the sentence ! No, sorry, the noticing threat is totally general, and has nothing to do with the type of threat. It could be a trap, for example. Nothing links it to the combat, except for a clear reference that says "when combat start, use the combat section": "If the adventurers encounter a hostile creature or group, the DM determines whether the adventurers or their foes might be [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#Surprise']surprised[/URL] when combat erupts. See [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/phb/combat']chapter 9[/URL] for more about [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/phb/combat#Surprise']surprise[/URL]." And that's it. It tells you to apply the surprise rules of chapter 9, which starts with "determining surprise by pp vs. steath check". Where does it say "autofail exactly" ? Exactly what I said and applied. Where does it say autofail ? How does "not contributing to the group's success" translate to autofail ? By what magic ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast master wants to use pet to get +5 to passive perception
Top