Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast master wants to use pet to get +5 to passive perception
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 8546978" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>This is not true. He doesn't want group to mean individual. It's just that like me, he understands that groups are made up OF individuals. Groups(an adventuring party) can all make individual checks by RAW. If they entire group runs at a chasm and leaps over all at once, they do not make a group check to get across. Each one makes an individual check and some may not make it across while others do. </p><p></p><p>In the context of the surrounding text, the sentence you are hanging your hat on does not mean group check. It's clear from the surrounding text and the surprise rules the travel rules bow to require these passive perception checks to be individual.</p><p></p><p>Whereas I'm going by RAW. I've shown you multiple charts that show that the travel rules are based on racial movement rates. You're looking at examples that can apply to my argument and yours both, but you are choosing to stick your head in the sand and ignore clearly written rules that show you to be wrong. It's not something that I "want." It's what it is. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 8546978, member: 23751"] This is not true. He doesn't want group to mean individual. It's just that like me, he understands that groups are made up OF individuals. Groups(an adventuring party) can all make individual checks by RAW. If they entire group runs at a chasm and leaps over all at once, they do not make a group check to get across. Each one makes an individual check and some may not make it across while others do. In the context of the surrounding text, the sentence you are hanging your hat on does not mean group check. It's clear from the surrounding text and the surprise rules the travel rules bow to require these passive perception checks to be individual. Whereas I'm going by RAW. I've shown you multiple charts that show that the travel rules are based on racial movement rates. You're looking at examples that can apply to my argument and yours both, but you are choosing to stick your head in the sand and ignore clearly written rules that show you to be wrong. It's not something that I "want." It's what it is. 🤷♂️ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Beast master wants to use pet to get +5 to passive perception
Top