Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Before the Big Bang
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4629567" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>That is one of the many terrible analogies or exaggerations I hate. Yes, using Red Sox overcoming their curse is ridicilous, considering the Big Bang to be the point where the universe exploded (rapidly expanded) is not. It just might not be how it was defined. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>One might need to be precise, but the problem is we are talking about new discoveries that might require us to redefine certain terms - or at least define them more specifically. </p><p></p><p>Here's a bit from Wikipedia related "cylcical" model of the world using the idea of branes: </p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology</a>)</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_Universe_Theory" target="_blank">Cyclic model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p><p></p><p>The cyclic universe indicates there is something before the Big Bang. And the theory involved mixing the inflaton and the "curvaton" fields certainly is not the same as the current "Big Bang" theory. (Well, assuming Wikipedia is up to date on the currently accepted model of the Big Bang. To be up to date and precise, I'd have to be in the "scene" and read journals, not the ocassional book, magizine entry or wikipedia)</p><p>But then, I find this: </p><p></p><p>So I guess for the inflaton/curvaton model, the Big Bang is still the start and they were imprecise. </p><p></p><p>The Brane theory (or is it merely an idea, like the holographic universe, nothing with enough foundation to be called a theory?) would indicate that the the 4 dimensions of spacetime exist independently from our universe, but we are limited by the brane of our universe in our movement. We can't go "before" the big bang because we'd have to leave our brane, which we can't (at least not to our knowledge). But there still is a "before" since the dimension goes "further".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 4629567, member: 710"] That is one of the many terrible analogies or exaggerations I hate. Yes, using Red Sox overcoming their curse is ridicilous, considering the Big Bang to be the point where the universe exploded (rapidly expanded) is not. It just might not be how it was defined. ;) One might need to be precise, but the problem is we are talking about new discoveries that might require us to redefine certain terms - or at least define them more specifically. Here's a bit from Wikipedia related "cylcical" model of the world using the idea of branes: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology[/url]) [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_Universe_Theory]Cyclic model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] The cyclic universe indicates there is something before the Big Bang. And the theory involved mixing the inflaton and the "curvaton" fields certainly is not the same as the current "Big Bang" theory. (Well, assuming Wikipedia is up to date on the currently accepted model of the Big Bang. To be up to date and precise, I'd have to be in the "scene" and read journals, not the ocassional book, magizine entry or wikipedia) But then, I find this: So I guess for the inflaton/curvaton model, the Big Bang is still the start and they were imprecise. The Brane theory (or is it merely an idea, like the holographic universe, nothing with enough foundation to be called a theory?) would indicate that the the 4 dimensions of spacetime exist independently from our universe, but we are limited by the brane of our universe in our movement. We can't go "before" the big bang because we'd have to leave our brane, which we can't (at least not to our knowledge). But there still is a "before" since the dimension goes "further". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Before the Big Bang
Top