Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 7919998" data-attributes="member: 6696971">Alright, just was about to start follow-ups.Lowkey, seriously, I have no clue how you came up with that summation of what I wrote. It’s not even in the same dimension of what (I thought) I actually wrote.This is what I meant to write:* I don’t want to engage with meta-analysis of board culture, psychology, and forum posting ethics (completely leaving to the side of whether the take that was in your post about them was correct or not). There is a tendency on this board for these meta-analyses and they tend to dominate conversations when they emerge. I’m not interested in them so I’m not going to engage with that portion of your post. I’m going to engage with our disagreement over the term/usage/relevance if Force.* There was nothing in there calling you an edition warrior or a troll. Not even close. I said that sucks that people do that, and I agree that it happens now and again, but it’s many times reduced since 4e left prominence.That is pretty much it. Looking at that and the original, I still don’t understand where your pereception of what I posted is coming from.People reading this:Please call me out on this if what I wrote contained all of that offense cause holy crap...dead...serious. I need to know because, if so, I’ve got some serious issues that I need to sort out (some kind of disconnection from what I’m writing).If folks say that what you have written above is the substance of my post and offense-worthy in the same way, I’ll apologize a thousand times, and take some nice time away to figure out how in the hell Im so removed from what I’m typing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 7919998, member: 6696971"] Alright, just was about to start follow-ups. Lowkey, seriously, I have no clue how you came up with that summation of what I wrote. It’s not even in the same dimension of what (I thought) I actually wrote. This is what I meant to write: * I don’t want to engage with meta-analysis of board culture, psychology, and forum posting ethics (completely leaving to the side of whether the take that was in your post about them was correct or not). There is a tendency on this board for these meta-analyses and they tend to dominate conversations when they emerge. I’m not interested in them so I’m not going to engage with that portion of your post. I’m going to engage with our disagreement over the term/usage/relevance if Force. * There was nothing in there calling you an edition warrior or a troll. Not even close. I said that sucks that people do that, and I agree that it happens now and again, but it’s many times reduced since 4e left prominence. That is pretty much it. Looking at that and the original, I still don’t understand where your pereception of what I posted is coming from. People reading this: Please call me out on this if what I wrote contained all of that offense cause holy crap...dead...serious. I need to know because, if so, I’ve got some serious issues that I need to sort out (some kind of disconnection from what I’m writing). If folks say that what you have written above is the substance of my post and offense-worthy in the same way, I’ll apologize a thousand times, and take some nice time away to figure out how in the hell Im so removed from what I’m typing. [/QUOTE]

Verification